Politics, preoccupations, pragmatics: a race/ethnicity redux for social work research
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: European Journal of Social Work, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.11.2020, p. 1057-1068.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Politics, preoccupations, pragmatics: a race/ethnicity redux for social work research
AU - Williams, Charlotte
N1 - Charlotte Williams OBE, is Honorary Professor in the School of History, Philosophy and Social Sciences, Bangor University, Wales.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - The need for sustained scholarly analysis and knowledge building on issues of race and ethnicity in social work research is as compelling as ever given the intensification of global racial inequalities, issues associated with the ‘migrant crisis’, the spread of populist racialised political discourse and the ongoing downward pressure of neo-liberal imperatives. This field of research has been subject to deep conceptual shifts, competing theoretical orientations, new methodological trajectories, ambivalence and, some say, conspicuous attrition. In this article, I draw on multi-disciplinary and cross-national theorising to examine shifts in the contemporary context of ‘race/ethnicity’ research (the politics); consider the evidence on current trends and tendencies in the content of social work research (preoccupations) and examine some of the challenges of race/ethnicity (R/E) scholarship, and of ensuring attention to these dimensions in social work research (pragmatics). In these terms, I seek to ask critical questions of the social work research enterprise and its responsibilities in relation to human rights and social justice. I set out a call to the European academy and to the responsibilities of all social work researchers, editors, reviewers and knowledge builders, resurrecting Boushel’s searching question: ‘What kind of people are we?’.
AB - The need for sustained scholarly analysis and knowledge building on issues of race and ethnicity in social work research is as compelling as ever given the intensification of global racial inequalities, issues associated with the ‘migrant crisis’, the spread of populist racialised political discourse and the ongoing downward pressure of neo-liberal imperatives. This field of research has been subject to deep conceptual shifts, competing theoretical orientations, new methodological trajectories, ambivalence and, some say, conspicuous attrition. In this article, I draw on multi-disciplinary and cross-national theorising to examine shifts in the contemporary context of ‘race/ethnicity’ research (the politics); consider the evidence on current trends and tendencies in the content of social work research (preoccupations) and examine some of the challenges of race/ethnicity (R/E) scholarship, and of ensuring attention to these dimensions in social work research (pragmatics). In these terms, I seek to ask critical questions of the social work research enterprise and its responsibilities in relation to human rights and social justice. I set out a call to the European academy and to the responsibilities of all social work researchers, editors, reviewers and knowledge builders, resurrecting Boushel’s searching question: ‘What kind of people are we?’.
U2 - 10.1080/13691457.2020.1751590
DO - 10.1080/13691457.2020.1751590
M3 - Article
VL - 23
SP - 1057
EP - 1068
JO - European Journal of Social Work
JF - European Journal of Social Work
SN - 1369-1457
IS - 6
ER -