Pre-adoption market reaction to IFRS 9: A cross-country event-study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 33, No. 6, 30.08.2014, p. 628–637.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pre-adoption market reaction to IFRS 9: A cross-country event-study
AU - Onali, E.
AU - Ginesti, G.
PY - 2014/8/30
Y1 - 2014/8/30
N2 - We are the first to examine the market reaction to 13 announcement dates related to IFRS 9 for over 5400 European listed firms. We find an overall positive reaction to the introduction of IFRS 9. The regulation is particularly beneficial to shareholders of firms in countries with weaker rule of law and a smaller divergence between local GAAP and IAS 39. Bootstrap simulations rule out the possibility that sampling error or data mining are driving our findings. Our main findings are also robust to confounding events and the extent of the media coverage for each event. These results suggest that investors perceive the new regulation as shareholder-wealth enhancing and support the view that stronger comparability across accounting standards of European firms is beneficial to international investors and outweighs the costs of poorer firm-specific information.
AB - We are the first to examine the market reaction to 13 announcement dates related to IFRS 9 for over 5400 European listed firms. We find an overall positive reaction to the introduction of IFRS 9. The regulation is particularly beneficial to shareholders of firms in countries with weaker rule of law and a smaller divergence between local GAAP and IAS 39. Bootstrap simulations rule out the possibility that sampling error or data mining are driving our findings. Our main findings are also robust to confounding events and the extent of the media coverage for each event. These results suggest that investors perceive the new regulation as shareholder-wealth enhancing and support the view that stronger comparability across accounting standards of European firms is beneficial to international investors and outweighs the costs of poorer firm-specific information.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.08.004
M3 - Article
VL - 33
SP - 628
EP - 637
JO - Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
JF - Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
SN - 0278-4254
IS - 6
ER -