Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation-phase III (FEMuR III)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 10, No. 10, 16.10.2020, p. e039791.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture
T2 - fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation-phase III (FEMuR III)
AU - Williams, Nefyn
AU - Dodd, Susanna
AU - Hardwick, Ben
AU - Clayton, Dannii
AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
AU - Charles, Joanna Mary
AU - Logan, Phillipa
AU - Busse, Monica
AU - Lewis, Ruth
AU - Smith, Toby O
AU - Sackley, Catherine
AU - Morrison, Val
AU - Lemmey, Andrew
AU - Masterson-Algar, Patricia
AU - Howard, Lola
AU - Hennessy, Sophie
AU - Soady, Claire
AU - Ralph, Penelope
AU - Dobson, Susan
AU - Dorkenoo, Shanaz
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/10/16
Y1 - 2020/10/16
N2 - Introduction Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. Methods and analysis Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio. Allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built in random element. Secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal-setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. Ethics and dissemination NHS research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. Registration details ISRCTN28376407 registered on 23/11/2018.
AB - Introduction Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. Methods and analysis Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio. Allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built in random element. Secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal-setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. Ethics and dissemination NHS research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. Registration details ISRCTN28376407 registered on 23/11/2018.
KW - hip fracture, trauma, falls, community rehabilitation, domicilary, physiotherapy, occupational therapy
U2 - 10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-039791
DO - 10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-039791
M3 - Article
C2 - 33067298
VL - 10
SP - e039791
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 10
ER -