Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Jan Geert Hiddink
  • Sebastian J. van de Velde
    Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Robert A. McConnaughey
    NOAA Fisheries, USA
  • Emil De Borger
    Utrecht University
  • Justin Tiano
    Utrecht University
  • Michael J. Kaiser
    Herriot Watt University
  • Andrew Sweetman
    Herriot Watt University
  • Marija Sciberras
    Herriot Watt University
Sala, et al. 1 suggest that seafloor disturbance by industrial trawlers and dredgers results in 0.58 to 1.47 Pg of aqueous CO2 emissions annually, owing to increased organic carbon mineralisation in sediments after trawling. We agree that bottom trawling disrupts natural carbon flows in seabed ecosystems due to sediment disturbance, resuspension and changes in the biological community and that it is important to estimate the magnitude of this effect. We disagree however that their assessment represents a ‘best estimate’. Firstly, they critically assume that organic carbon in undisturbed sediment is inert, and that only disturbance by trawling remineralises organic carbon, an assumption at odds with decades of geochemical research. Secondly, they greatly overestimate the volume of sediment where carbon is mineralised after trawling. Thirdly, they ignore secondary effects, such as the removal of bioturbating benthic fauna and sedimentary nutrient release, which could lead to more preservation and production of organic carbon. Together these issues result in an upward bias in the estimated CO2 emissions by one or more orders of magnitude.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E1–E2
JournalNature
Volume617
Early online date10 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2023

Research outputs (1)

View all

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations