Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Conservation Biology, 01.12.2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying uncertainty about how interventions are assigned would improve impact evaluation in conservation: reply to Rasolofoson 2022
AU - Gordon Jones, Julia Patricia
AU - Barnes, Megan
AU - Eklund, Johanna
AU - Ferraro, Paul J.
AU - Geldmann, Jonas
AU - Oldekop, Johan A.
AU - Schleicher, Judith
N1 - https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14007
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
KW - causal inference
KW - counterfactual
KW - hidden bias
KW - impact evaluation
KW - statistical matching
U2 - 10.1111/cobi.14007
DO - 10.1111/cobi.14007
M3 - Comment/debate
JO - Conservation Biology
JF - Conservation Biology
SN - 0888-8892
M1 - e14007
ER -