Recasting Anti-Theism
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Standard Standard
Does God Matter?: Essays on the Axiological Consequences of Theism. ed. / Klaas Kraay. Routledge, 2017. (Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Recasting Anti-Theism
AU - Betenson, Toby
PY - 2017/12/18
Y1 - 2017/12/18
N2 - I offer a new defence of anti-theism by casting doubt on the notion that anti-theism should be understood as the judgement that God’s existence ‘makes the world worse’. Instead, anti-theism should be understood in terms of reasonable preferences that are not necessarily connected to rational judgements about the comparative value of possible worlds. I argue that it is reasonable to detach our preferences from our rational judgements about which possible worlds are ‘better’ or ‘worse’. It follows that it can be reasonable to prefer the non-existence of God even whilst accepting that God’s existence would be a good thing.
AB - I offer a new defence of anti-theism by casting doubt on the notion that anti-theism should be understood as the judgement that God’s existence ‘makes the world worse’. Instead, anti-theism should be understood in terms of reasonable preferences that are not necessarily connected to rational judgements about the comparative value of possible worlds. I argue that it is reasonable to detach our preferences from our rational judgements about which possible worlds are ‘better’ or ‘worse’. It follows that it can be reasonable to prefer the non-existence of God even whilst accepting that God’s existence would be a good thing.
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9780415793513
T3 - Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion
BT - Does God Matter?
A2 - Kraay, Klaas
PB - Routledge
ER -