Reciprocal or independent hemispheric specializations: Evidence from cerebral dominance for fluency, faces, and bodies in right- and left-handers
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
Objective: There are distinct cortical regions that respond preferentially to human faces and bodies. It is generally accepted that these face- and body-selective regions are lateralized with a preference for the right hemisphere, but unknown how frequently these biases occur or if they are lateralized in a complementary fashion to language processing.
Methods: fMRI was used to examine face and body lateralization in two samples of right-handers (n’s = 31 and 18) and left-handers (n’s = 43 and 24) with ‘typical’, left hemisphere, language dominance to examine the frequency of these biases. Crucially, we also recruited individuals with ‘atypical’, right hemisphere, language dominance (n’s = 17 and 10) to examine complementarity with language.
Results: Language typical right-handers had consistent population-level and average right-sided biases for face- and body perception. Language typical left-handers had population-level biases for faces in sample 2, but not sample 1; and for bodies in sample 1 but not sample 2. Language typical left-handers were, on average, right-lateralized for faces in both samples, but right-lateralized for bodies in sample 1 only. Language atypicals did not have a population-level bias for body- or face perception, and were, on average, left-lateralized for faces in sample 1, but not in sample 2. Atypicals were not lateralized for body perception.
Conclusions: These results add to the growing literature which suggests that many right hemisphere processes are not lateralized in a fully complementary fashion to language. Left-handers seem to have more varied lateralization patterns even when language dominance is controlled for.
Methods: fMRI was used to examine face and body lateralization in two samples of right-handers (n’s = 31 and 18) and left-handers (n’s = 43 and 24) with ‘typical’, left hemisphere, language dominance to examine the frequency of these biases. Crucially, we also recruited individuals with ‘atypical’, right hemisphere, language dominance (n’s = 17 and 10) to examine complementarity with language.
Results: Language typical right-handers had consistent population-level and average right-sided biases for face- and body perception. Language typical left-handers had population-level biases for faces in sample 2, but not sample 1; and for bodies in sample 1 but not sample 2. Language typical left-handers were, on average, right-lateralized for faces in both samples, but right-lateralized for bodies in sample 1 only. Language atypicals did not have a population-level bias for body- or face perception, and were, on average, left-lateralized for faces in sample 1, but not in sample 2. Atypicals were not lateralized for body perception.
Conclusions: These results add to the growing literature which suggests that many right hemisphere processes are not lateralized in a fully complementary fashion to language. Left-handers seem to have more varied lateralization patterns even when language dominance is controlled for.
Keywords
- Hemispheric lateralization, functional brain asymmetry, atypical language dominance, Handedness
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 89-104 |
Journal | Psychology & Neuroscience |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
Total downloads
No data available