Reduced Impact Logging and Silvicultural Interventions in Ghana: the Case of Bobiri Forest Reserve
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: International Forestry Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2017, p. 369-380.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced Impact Logging and Silvicultural Interventions in Ghana: the Case of Bobiri Forest Reserve
AU - Sanfilippo, Massimiliano
AU - Akampulira, Emmanuel
AU - Mohase, Anna
AU - Okonkwo, Henry
AU - Ouyoumb, Philip
AU - Tumber, Robert
AU - Walmsley, James
AU - Rayment, Mark
N1 - Journal: International Forestry Review (ISSN: 1465-5489) RoMEO: This is a RoMEO yellow journal Author's Pre-print: green tick author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) Author's Post-print: cross author cannot archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) Publisher's Version/PDF: cross author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The recovery of selectively harvested tropical forests should benefit from a range of management practices referred to as “Reduced Impact Logging (RIL)”. Failure to apply these practices is likely to slow recovery as has been observed in various regions of the world including Ghana. Although the Revised Logging Manual for Ghana (LMG) includes some RIL measures, forest recovery is slower than predicted by yield models and is unsustainable in the currently applied forty-year logging cycle. This study adopted a multi-disciplinary approach to investigate the implementation of RIL in Bobiri Forest Reserve, Ghana. A comparative analysis of the LMG and a Regional Code of Practice for reduced-impact forest harvesting was also conducted. The results of this study suggest that the implementation of RIL measures in Bobiri is sporadic due to barriers in the flow of information among stakeholders and to the lack of technical training for field staff of logging companies. Logging companies tend to implement RIL measures if they receive clear and feasible indications, but such information is often unavailable to them.
AB - The recovery of selectively harvested tropical forests should benefit from a range of management practices referred to as “Reduced Impact Logging (RIL)”. Failure to apply these practices is likely to slow recovery as has been observed in various regions of the world including Ghana. Although the Revised Logging Manual for Ghana (LMG) includes some RIL measures, forest recovery is slower than predicted by yield models and is unsustainable in the currently applied forty-year logging cycle. This study adopted a multi-disciplinary approach to investigate the implementation of RIL in Bobiri Forest Reserve, Ghana. A comparative analysis of the LMG and a Regional Code of Practice for reduced-impact forest harvesting was also conducted. The results of this study suggest that the implementation of RIL measures in Bobiri is sporadic due to barriers in the flow of information among stakeholders and to the lack of technical training for field staff of logging companies. Logging companies tend to implement RIL measures if they receive clear and feasible indications, but such information is often unavailable to them.
KW - RIL
KW - Ghana
KW - silviculture
KW - harvesting guidelines
KW - flow of information
U2 - 10.1505/146554817821865090
DO - 10.1505/146554817821865090
M3 - Article
VL - 19
SP - 369
EP - 380
JO - International Forestry Review
JF - International Forestry Review
SN - 1465-5489
IS - 3
T2 - MSc Tropical Forestry (distance learning) residential course in Ghana
Y2 - 18 July 2015 through 1 August 2015
ER -