Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving. / Graham, Kathryn; Miller, Peter; Chikritzhs, Tanya et al.
In: Addiction, Vol. 109, No. 5, 05.2014, p. 693-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Graham, K, Miller, P, Chikritzhs, T, Bellis, MA, Clapp, JD, Hughes, K, Toomey, TL & Wells, S 2014, 'Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving', Addiction, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 693-8. https://doi.org/www.doi.org/10.1111/add.12247, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12247

APA

Graham, K., Miller, P., Chikritzhs, T., Bellis, M. A., Clapp, J. D., Hughes, K., Toomey, T. L., & Wells, S. (2014). Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving. Addiction, 109(5), 693-8. https://doi.org/www.doi.org/10.1111/add.12247, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12247

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Graham K, Miller P, Chikritzhs T, Bellis MA, Clapp JD, Hughes K et al. Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving. Addiction. 2014 May;109(5):693-8. doi: www.doi.org/10.1111/add.12247, 10.1111/add.12247

Author

Graham, Kathryn ; Miller, Peter ; Chikritzhs, Tanya et al. / Reducing intoxication among bar patrons : some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving. In: Addiction. 2014 ; Vol. 109, No. 5. pp. 693-8.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing intoxication among bar patrons

T2 - some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving

AU - Graham, Kathryn

AU - Miller, Peter

AU - Chikritzhs, Tanya

AU - Bellis, Mark A

AU - Clapp, John D

AU - Hughes, Karen

AU - Toomey, Traci L

AU - Wells, Samantha

N1 - © 2013 Society for the Study of Addiction.

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Intoxication in and around licensed premises continues to be common, despite widespread training in the responsible service of alcohol and laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals. However, research suggests that training and the existence of laws are unlikely to have an impact on intoxication without enforcement, and evidence from a number of countries indicates that laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals are rarely enforced. Enforcement is currently hampered by the lack of a standardized validated measure for defining intoxication clearly, a systematic approach to enforcement and the political will to address intoxication. We argue that adoption of key principles from successful interventions to prevent driving while intoxicated could be used to develop a model of consistent and sustainable enforcement. These principles include: applying validated and widely accepted criteria for defining when a person is 'intoxicated'; adopting a structure of enforceable consequences for violations; implementing procedures of unbiased enforcement; using publicity to ensure that there is a perceived high risk of being caught and punished; and developing the political will to support ongoing enforcement. Research can play a critical role in this process by: developing and validating criteria for defining intoxication based on observable behaviour; documenting the harms arising from intoxication, including risk curves associated with different levels of intoxication; estimating the policing, medical and social costs from intoxicated bar patrons; and conducting studies of the cost-effectiveness of different interventions to reduce intoxication.

AB - Intoxication in and around licensed premises continues to be common, despite widespread training in the responsible service of alcohol and laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals. However, research suggests that training and the existence of laws are unlikely to have an impact on intoxication without enforcement, and evidence from a number of countries indicates that laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals are rarely enforced. Enforcement is currently hampered by the lack of a standardized validated measure for defining intoxication clearly, a systematic approach to enforcement and the political will to address intoxication. We argue that adoption of key principles from successful interventions to prevent driving while intoxicated could be used to develop a model of consistent and sustainable enforcement. These principles include: applying validated and widely accepted criteria for defining when a person is 'intoxicated'; adopting a structure of enforceable consequences for violations; implementing procedures of unbiased enforcement; using publicity to ensure that there is a perceived high risk of being caught and punished; and developing the political will to support ongoing enforcement. Research can play a critical role in this process by: developing and validating criteria for defining intoxication based on observable behaviour; documenting the harms arising from intoxication, including risk curves associated with different levels of intoxication; estimating the policing, medical and social costs from intoxicated bar patrons; and conducting studies of the cost-effectiveness of different interventions to reduce intoxication.

KW - Alcohol Drinking

KW - Alcoholic Intoxication

KW - Automobile Driving

KW - Commerce

KW - Humans

KW - Law Enforcement

KW - Licensure

KW - Restaurants

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - www.doi.org/10.1111/add.12247

DO - www.doi.org/10.1111/add.12247

M3 - Article

C2 - 23796349

VL - 109

SP - 693

EP - 698

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 5

ER -