Relative performance of judgmental methods for forecasting the success of megaprojects
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 38, No. 3, 07.2022, p. 1185-1196.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative performance of judgmental methods for forecasting the success of megaprojects
AU - Litsiou, Konstantia
AU - Polychronakis, Yiannis
AU - Karami, Azhdar
AU - Nikolopoulos, Kostas
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Forecasting the success of megaprojects, such as the Olympic Games or space exploration missions, is a very difficult and important task because of the complexity of such projects and the large capital investment they require. Megaproject stakeholders do not typically employ formal forecasting methods, relying instead on Impact Assessments and/or Cost Benefit Analysis; these tools do not necessarily include forecasts, and thus there is no accountability. This study evaluates the effectiveness of judgemental methods towards successfully forecasting the accomplishment of specific megaproject objectives – when the measure of success is the collective accomplishment of such objectives. We compare the performance of three judgemental methods used by a group of 55 semi-experts: Unaided Judgement (UJ), semi-Structured Analogies (s-SA), and Interaction Groups (IG). The empirical evidence reveals that the use of s-SA leads to accuracy improvement compared with UJ. This improvement is amplified further when introducing pooling of analogies through teamwork in IG.
AB - Forecasting the success of megaprojects, such as the Olympic Games or space exploration missions, is a very difficult and important task because of the complexity of such projects and the large capital investment they require. Megaproject stakeholders do not typically employ formal forecasting methods, relying instead on Impact Assessments and/or Cost Benefit Analysis; these tools do not necessarily include forecasts, and thus there is no accountability. This study evaluates the effectiveness of judgemental methods towards successfully forecasting the accomplishment of specific megaproject objectives – when the measure of success is the collective accomplishment of such objectives. We compare the performance of three judgemental methods used by a group of 55 semi-experts: Unaided Judgement (UJ), semi-Structured Analogies (s-SA), and Interaction Groups (IG). The empirical evidence reveals that the use of s-SA leads to accuracy improvement compared with UJ. This improvement is amplified further when introducing pooling of analogies through teamwork in IG.
KW - Judgemental Forecasting; Megaprojects; Semi-Experts; Structured Analogies; Interaction Groups
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.018
M3 - Article
VL - 38
SP - 1185
EP - 1196
JO - International Journal of Forecasting
JF - International Journal of Forecasting
SN - 0169-2070
IS - 3
ER -