Relative performance of methods for forecasting special events
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 8, 29.03.2015, p. 1785-1791.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative performance of methods for forecasting special events
AU - Nikolopoulos, K.
AU - Litsa, A.
AU - Petropoulos, F.
AU - Bougioukos, V.
AU - Khammash, M.
PY - 2015/3/29
Y1 - 2015/3/29
N2 - Forecasting special events such as conflicts and epidemics is challenging because of their nature and the limited amount of historical information from which a reference base can be built. This study evaluates the performances of structured analogies, the Delphi method and interaction groups in forecasting the impact of such events. The empirical evidence reveals that the use of structured analogies leads to an average forecasting accuracy improvement of 8.4% compared to unaided judgment. This improvement in accuracy is greater when the use of structured analogies is accompanied by an increase in the level of expertise, the use of more analogies, the relevance of these analogies, and the introduction of pooling analogies through interaction within experts. Furthermore, the results from group judgmental forecasting approaches were very promising; the Delphi method and interaction groups improved accuracy by 27.0% and 54.4%, respectively.
AB - Forecasting special events such as conflicts and epidemics is challenging because of their nature and the limited amount of historical information from which a reference base can be built. This study evaluates the performances of structured analogies, the Delphi method and interaction groups in forecasting the impact of such events. The empirical evidence reveals that the use of structured analogies leads to an average forecasting accuracy improvement of 8.4% compared to unaided judgment. This improvement in accuracy is greater when the use of structured analogies is accompanied by an increase in the level of expertise, the use of more analogies, the relevance of these analogies, and the introduction of pooling analogies through interaction within experts. Furthermore, the results from group judgmental forecasting approaches were very promising; the Delphi method and interaction groups improved accuracy by 27.0% and 54.4%, respectively.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.037
DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.037
M3 - Article
VL - 68
SP - 1785
EP - 1791
JO - Journal of Business Research
JF - Journal of Business Research
SN - 0148-2963
IS - 8
ER -