Resilience in Later Life: Responding to Criticisms and Applying New Knowledge to the Experience of Dementia
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Standard Standard
Resilience and Aging. Emerging Science and Future Possibilities. . ed. / Andrew Wister; Theodore D Cosco. Vol. 1 1. ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2021. p. 31-49.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Resilience in Later Life: Responding to Criticisms and Applying New Knowledge to the Experience of Dementia
AU - Windle, Gill
N1 - This chapter reflects keynote lectures delivered by the author at the: 28th Annual John K Friesen Conference "Understanding and Fostering Resilience in Older Adults: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 10 & 11 June 2019. 48th Annual Conference of the British Society of Gerontology "Resilience and Living Well in Local Communities". Liverpool, England, 10-12 July 2019.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - The 21st Century has seen the concept of resilience as applied to later life becoming increasingly well-established in research, policy and practice. Proponents of the concept argue resilience research challenges stereotypes of ageing, an important consideration in societies faced by ageism and discrimination. It has shown how some older people are able to ‘beat the odds’, providing insights into adjustment processes that might be generalizable to others experiencing difficulties. Counter to this, however, are criticisms of resilience; that is difficult to define and measure and so impossible to be accurately targeted by services. A further criticism relates to some of the interpretations (and misinterpretations) of resilience by governments and services. Public health policies increasingly place the responsibility for health on the individual, as if we can somehow build superhuman people that will withstand all manner of difficulties. In this article I provide a general overview of some of these challenges we face as researchers and suggest some tentative solutions, albeit these are still open for debate.
AB - The 21st Century has seen the concept of resilience as applied to later life becoming increasingly well-established in research, policy and practice. Proponents of the concept argue resilience research challenges stereotypes of ageing, an important consideration in societies faced by ageism and discrimination. It has shown how some older people are able to ‘beat the odds’, providing insights into adjustment processes that might be generalizable to others experiencing difficulties. Counter to this, however, are criticisms of resilience; that is difficult to define and measure and so impossible to be accurately targeted by services. A further criticism relates to some of the interpretations (and misinterpretations) of resilience by governments and services. Public health policies increasingly place the responsibility for health on the individual, as if we can somehow build superhuman people that will withstand all manner of difficulties. In this article I provide a general overview of some of these challenges we face as researchers and suggest some tentative solutions, albeit these are still open for debate.
KW - Resilience
KW - Ageing
KW - Dementia
KW - Living well
KW - Health
KW - Social Justice
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978-030-57088-0
VL - 1
SP - 31
EP - 49
BT - Resilience and Aging. Emerging Science and Future Possibilities.
A2 - Wister, Andrew
A2 - Cosco, Theodore D
PB - Springer International Publishing
CY - Switzerland
ER -