Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low. / MacLeod, K. J.; Lukas, D.
In: Biology letters, Vol. 10, No. 6, 30.06.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

MacLeod KJ, Lukas D. Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low. Biology letters. 2014 Jun 30;10(6). Epub 2014 Jun 6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0378

Author

MacLeod, K. J. ; Lukas, D. / Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low. In: Biology letters. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low

AU - MacLeod, K. J.

AU - Lukas, D.

PY - 2014/6/30

Y1 - 2014/6/30

N2 - Allonursing, the nursing of another female's offspring, is commonly assumed to have evolved through the benefits of kin selection or reciprocity. The evolution of allonursing may also be influenced by variation in the possible costs to allonurses. The relative influence of costs and benefits on the incidence of allonursing in mammals remains unexplored. We show, using comparative analyses, that where females group with kin, the presence or the absence of allonursing is not associated with further variation in relatedness. Allonursing is most common where females produce litters; here the relative investment per offspring is low, and the costs of nursing additional young are likely to be reduced. Our results suggest that variation in the potential benefits is not associated with the distribution of allonursing, but that allonursing can quickly evolve when the costs to allonurses of nursing additional offspring are low.

AB - Allonursing, the nursing of another female's offspring, is commonly assumed to have evolved through the benefits of kin selection or reciprocity. The evolution of allonursing may also be influenced by variation in the possible costs to allonurses. The relative influence of costs and benefits on the incidence of allonursing in mammals remains unexplored. We show, using comparative analyses, that where females group with kin, the presence or the absence of allonursing is not associated with further variation in relatedness. Allonursing is most common where females produce litters; here the relative investment per offspring is low, and the costs of nursing additional young are likely to be reduced. Our results suggest that variation in the potential benefits is not associated with the distribution of allonursing, but that allonursing can quickly evolve when the costs to allonurses of nursing additional offspring are low.

KW - allonursing

KW - mammals

KW - cooperation

U2 - 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0378

DO - 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0378

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Biology letters

JF - Biology letters

SN - 1744-9561

IS - 6

ER -