Risk can be good for self-esteem: Beyond self-determination theory
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 30.04.2020, p. 411-423.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk can be good for self-esteem
T2 - Beyond self-determination theory
AU - Woodman, Tim
AU - MacGregor, Alexandra
AU - Hardy, Lewis
PY - 2020/4/30
Y1 - 2020/4/30
N2 - Despite many decades of research that has highlighted all risk-taking sport activities as a means to satisfy sensation seeking needs (e.g., Zuckerman, 1979), recent research has challenged that view and has revealed that some high-risk activities provide opportunities for agentic emotion regulation during participation, and are not driven by sensation-seeking needs (e.g., Barlow, Woodman, & Hardy, 2013). Participation in high-risk sports is also associated with increased self-esteem (e.g., Aşçi, Demirhan, & Dinç, 2007). The aim of the present study was to investigate the link between the agentic and emotion regulation benefits of specific high-risk activities and any associated self-esteem benefits. We hypothesized that the emotion regulation and agency experiences in high-risk physical activities would mirror the elevated self-esteem derived from these activities. We examined high-risk activity (n = 84), low-risk activity (n = 65), and control (n = 45) groups and found that the experience of agentic emotion regulation was greater during participation for high-risk sport participants. High-risk sport participants also had less post-activity difficulty with emotion regulation and higher self-esteem. This study provides the first support that activities that require greater agentic emotion regulation during participation also lead to elevated self-esteem. Basic psychological needs satisfaction did not account for the differences between groups, suggesting that people have other needs (e.g., the need to self-regulate) that are not incorporated into self-determination theory.
AB - Despite many decades of research that has highlighted all risk-taking sport activities as a means to satisfy sensation seeking needs (e.g., Zuckerman, 1979), recent research has challenged that view and has revealed that some high-risk activities provide opportunities for agentic emotion regulation during participation, and are not driven by sensation-seeking needs (e.g., Barlow, Woodman, & Hardy, 2013). Participation in high-risk sports is also associated with increased self-esteem (e.g., Aşçi, Demirhan, & Dinç, 2007). The aim of the present study was to investigate the link between the agentic and emotion regulation benefits of specific high-risk activities and any associated self-esteem benefits. We hypothesized that the emotion regulation and agency experiences in high-risk physical activities would mirror the elevated self-esteem derived from these activities. We examined high-risk activity (n = 84), low-risk activity (n = 65), and control (n = 45) groups and found that the experience of agentic emotion regulation was greater during participation for high-risk sport participants. High-risk sport participants also had less post-activity difficulty with emotion regulation and higher self-esteem. This study provides the first support that activities that require greater agentic emotion regulation during participation also lead to elevated self-esteem. Basic psychological needs satisfaction did not account for the differences between groups, suggesting that people have other needs (e.g., the need to self-regulate) that are not incorporated into self-determination theory.
KW - High-risk sport
KW - agency
KW - competency
KW - emotion regulation
KW - human endeavor
U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2019.1588913
DO - 10.1080/13669877.2019.1588913
M3 - Article
VL - 23
SP - 411
EP - 423
JO - Journal of Risk Research
JF - Journal of Risk Research
SN - 1366-9877
IS - 4
ER -