Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

DOI

  • Jan Geert Hiddink
  • Michel J. Kaiser
  • Marija Sciberras
  • Robert A. McConnaughey
    RACE Division Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries ServiceNOAA Seattle WA USA
  • Tessa Mazor
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere Brisbane Qld Australia
  • Ray Hilborn
    University of Washington, Seattle
  • Jeremy S. Collie
    Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island Narragansett RI USA
  • C. Roland Pitcher
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere Brisbane Qld Australia
  • Ana M. Parma
    Centro Nacional PatagónicoCONICET Puerto Madryn Argentina
  • Petri Suuronen
    Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Helsinki Finland
  • Adriaan D. Rijnsdorp
    Wageningen Marine Research IJmuiden The Netherlands
  • Simon Jennings
    University of East Anglia
Bottom trawl fisheries are the most widespread source of anthropogenic physical disturbance to seabed habitats. Development of fisheries-, conservation- and ecosystem-based management strategies requires the selection of indicators of the impact of bottom trawling on the state of benthic biota. Many indicators have been proposed, but no rigorous test of a range of candidate indicators against nine commonly agreed criteria (concreteness, theoretical basis, public awareness, cost, measurement, historical data, sensitivity, responsiveness, specificity) has been performed.
Here, we collated data from 41 studies that compared the benthic biota in trawled areas with those in control locations (that were either not trawled or trawled infrequently), examining seven potential indicators (numbers and biomass for individual taxa and whole communities, evenness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and species richness) to assess their performance against the set of nine criteria.
The effects of trawling were stronger on whole-community numbers and biomass than for individual taxa. Species richness was also negatively affected by trawling but other measures of diversity were not. Community numbers and biomass met all criteria, taxa numbers and biomass and species richness satisfied most criteria, but evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity did not respond to trawling and only met few criteria, and hence are not suitable state indicators of the effect of bottom trawling.
Synthesis and applications. An evaluation of each candidate indicator against a commonly agreed suite of desirable properties coupled with the outputs of our meta-analysis showed that whole-community numbers of individuals and biomass are the most suitable indicators of bottom trawling impacts as they performed well on all criteria. Strengths of these indicators are that they respond strongly to trawling, relate directly to ecosystem functioning and are straightforward to measure. Evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity are not responsive to trawling and unsuitable for the monitoring and assessment of bottom trawl impacts.

Keywords

  • Ecology
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1199-1209
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume57
Issue number7
Early online date19 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020
View graph of relations