Sensory systems and spatial memory in the fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacus
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Ethology, Vol. 111, No. 8, 08.2005, p. 715-725.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensory systems and spatial memory in the fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacus
AU - Holland, Richard
AU - Winter, P.
AU - Waters, D.A.
PY - 2005/8
Y1 - 2005/8
N2 - The megachiropteran fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacus is able to orient and navigate using both vision and echolocation. These two sensory systems have different environmental constraints however, echolocation being relatively short range when compared with vision. Despite this difference, an experiment testing their memory of a perch location demonstrates that once the location of a perch is learned R. aegyptiacus is not influenced by the movement of local landmark cues in the vicinity of the perch under either light or dark conditions. Thus despite the differing constraints of vision and echolocation, this suggests a place is remembered as a location in space and not by associations with landmarks in the vicinity. A decrease in initial performance when the task was repeated in the dark suggested the possibility that a memory of a location learned using vision does not generalize to echolocation.
AB - The megachiropteran fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacus is able to orient and navigate using both vision and echolocation. These two sensory systems have different environmental constraints however, echolocation being relatively short range when compared with vision. Despite this difference, an experiment testing their memory of a perch location demonstrates that once the location of a perch is learned R. aegyptiacus is not influenced by the movement of local landmark cues in the vicinity of the perch under either light or dark conditions. Thus despite the differing constraints of vision and echolocation, this suggests a place is remembered as a location in space and not by associations with landmarks in the vicinity. A decrease in initial performance when the task was repeated in the dark suggested the possibility that a memory of a location learned using vision does not generalize to echolocation.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01099.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01099.x
M3 - Article
VL - 111
SP - 715
EP - 725
JO - Ethology
JF - Ethology
SN - 0179-1613
IS - 8
ER -