Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance. / Jackson, M.C.; Linden, D.E.; Roberts, M.V. et al.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 41, No. 6, 25.05.2015, p. 1884-1892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Jackson, MC, Linden, DE, Roberts, MV, Kriegeskorte, N & Haenschel, C 2015, 'Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1884-1892. https://doi.org/psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

APA

Jackson, M. C., Linden, D. E., Roberts, M. V., Kriegeskorte, N., & Haenschel, C. (2015). Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1884-1892. https://doi.org/psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

CBE

Jackson MC, Linden DE, Roberts MV, Kriegeskorte N, Haenschel C. 2015. Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41(6):1884-1892. https://doi.org/psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

MLA

Jackson, M.C. et al. "Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2015, 41(6). 1884-1892. https://doi.org/psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

VancouverVancouver

Jackson MC, Linden DE, Roberts MV, Kriegeskorte N, Haenschel C. Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2015 May 25;41(6):1884-1892. doi: psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

Author

Jackson, M.C. ; Linden, D.E. ; Roberts, M.V. et al. / Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 1884-1892.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarity, Not Complexity, Determines Visual Working Memory Performance

AU - Jackson, M.C.

AU - Linden, D.E.

AU - Roberts, M.V.

AU - Kriegeskorte, N.

AU - Haenschel, C.

PY - 2015/5/25

Y1 - 2015/5/25

N2 - A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits.

AB - A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits.

U2 - psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

DO - psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xlm0000125

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1884

EP - 1892

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 6

ER -