Similarity-induced interference or facilitation in language production reflects representation, not selection
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Cognition, Vol. 245, 105720, 04.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Similarity-induced interference or facilitation in language production reflects representation, not selection
AU - Oppenheim, Gary
AU - Nozari, Nazbanou
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Researchers have long interpreted the presence or absence of semantic interference in picture naming latencies as confirming or refuting theoretical claims regarding competitive lexical selection. But inconsistent empirical results challenge any mechanistic interpretation. A behavioral experiment first verified an apparent boundary condition in a blocked picture naming task: when orthogonally manipulating association type, taxonomic associations consistently elicit interference, while thematic associations do not. A plausible representational difference is that thematic feature activations depend more on supporting contexts. Simulations show that contextsensitivity emerges from the distributional statistics that are often used to measure thematic associations: residual semantic activation facilitates the retrieval of words that share semanticfeatures, counteracting learning-based interference, and training a production model with greater sequential cooccurrence for thematically related words causes it to acquire stronger residual activation for thematic features. Modulating residual activation, either directly or through training, allows the model to capture gradient values of interference and facilitation, and in everysimulation competitive and noncompetitive selection algorithms produce qualitatively equivalent results.
AB - Researchers have long interpreted the presence or absence of semantic interference in picture naming latencies as confirming or refuting theoretical claims regarding competitive lexical selection. But inconsistent empirical results challenge any mechanistic interpretation. A behavioral experiment first verified an apparent boundary condition in a blocked picture naming task: when orthogonally manipulating association type, taxonomic associations consistently elicit interference, while thematic associations do not. A plausible representational difference is that thematic feature activations depend more on supporting contexts. Simulations show that contextsensitivity emerges from the distributional statistics that are often used to measure thematic associations: residual semantic activation facilitates the retrieval of words that share semanticfeatures, counteracting learning-based interference, and training a production model with greater sequential cooccurrence for thematically related words causes it to acquire stronger residual activation for thematic features. Modulating residual activation, either directly or through training, allows the model to capture gradient values of interference and facilitation, and in everysimulation competitive and noncompetitive selection algorithms produce qualitatively equivalent results.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105720
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105720
M3 - Article
VL - 245
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
SN - 0010-0277
M1 - 105720
ER -