Slurry acidification is as effective as slurry injection at reducing ammonia emissions without increasing N2O emissions: A short-term mesocosm study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Geoderma Regional, Vol. 37, 00791, 01.06.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Slurry acidification is as effective as slurry injection at reducing ammonia emissions without increasing N2O emissions: A short-term mesocosm study
AU - Langley-Randall, John
AU - Jones, Davey L.
AU - Cotton, Joseph
AU - Williams, John R
AU - Chadwick, Dave R
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Agriculture currently accounts for 90% of UK ammonia (NH3) emissions, however, national legally-binding targets are seeking to reduce this by 16% by 2030, relative to 2005 levels. One area which has been targeted to help achieve this target is the lowering of NH3 emissions during livestock manure handling and storage. Slurry acidification represents one potential strategy to abate NH3 throughout the slurry management chain, however, is not currently used in the UK. To address this knowledge gap, two mesocosm-scale experiments were set up to assess the potential for slurry acidification to reduce NH3 emissions at application and to measure impacts on NH3 emissions and short-term changes to soil mineral dynamics and N2O emissions. Experiment 1 determined the impacts of acidified cattle slurry (pH 6.5, 5.5, and 4.8) to conventional (non-acidified) slurry when simulating surface broadcasting. Experiment 2 assessed the impact of conventional and acidified slurry (pH 5.5) using simulated surface broadcasting and shallow injection of cattle slurry. Our results showed that acidification significantly abated NH3 (% of NH4-N applied) from 61.6% for conventional slurry to 26.6% at pH 5.5, and 2.5% at pH 4.8. Acidified surface broadcast was as effective at abating NH3 emissions to injected conventional slurry, and also delayed nitrification, while not significantly altering N2O emissions from conventional slurry. Our results strongly suggest that slurry acidification could be a viable strategy to help the UK reach its NH3 reduction target and exceed the current abatement potential through combining low emissions spreading techniques with acidification.
AB - Agriculture currently accounts for 90% of UK ammonia (NH3) emissions, however, national legally-binding targets are seeking to reduce this by 16% by 2030, relative to 2005 levels. One area which has been targeted to help achieve this target is the lowering of NH3 emissions during livestock manure handling and storage. Slurry acidification represents one potential strategy to abate NH3 throughout the slurry management chain, however, is not currently used in the UK. To address this knowledge gap, two mesocosm-scale experiments were set up to assess the potential for slurry acidification to reduce NH3 emissions at application and to measure impacts on NH3 emissions and short-term changes to soil mineral dynamics and N2O emissions. Experiment 1 determined the impacts of acidified cattle slurry (pH 6.5, 5.5, and 4.8) to conventional (non-acidified) slurry when simulating surface broadcasting. Experiment 2 assessed the impact of conventional and acidified slurry (pH 5.5) using simulated surface broadcasting and shallow injection of cattle slurry. Our results showed that acidification significantly abated NH3 (% of NH4-N applied) from 61.6% for conventional slurry to 26.6% at pH 5.5, and 2.5% at pH 4.8. Acidified surface broadcast was as effective at abating NH3 emissions to injected conventional slurry, and also delayed nitrification, while not significantly altering N2O emissions from conventional slurry. Our results strongly suggest that slurry acidification could be a viable strategy to help the UK reach its NH3 reduction target and exceed the current abatement potential through combining low emissions spreading techniques with acidification.
U2 - 10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00791
DO - 10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00791
M3 - Article
VL - 37
JO - Geoderma Regional
JF - Geoderma Regional
SN - 2352-0094
M1 - 00791
ER -