Soil microbial biomass-Interpretation and consideration for soil monitoring
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Soil & Tillage Research, Vol. 49, No. 4, 19.05.2011, p. 287-304.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil microbial biomass-Interpretation and consideration for soil monitoring
AU - Gonzalez-Quinones, V.
AU - Stockdale, E. A.
AU - Banning, N. C.
AU - Hoyle, F. C.
AU - Sawada, Y.
AU - Wherrett, A. D.
AU - Jones, D. L.
AU - Murphy, D. V.
PY - 2011/5/19
Y1 - 2011/5/19
N2 - Since 1970, measurement of the soil microbial biomass (SMB) has been widely adopted as a relatively simple means of assessing the impact of environmental and anthropogenic change on soil microorganisms. The SMB is living and dynamic, and its activity is responsible for the regulation of organic matter transformations and associated energy and nutrient cycling in soil. At a gross level, an increase in SMB is considered beneficial, while a decline in SMB may be considered detrimental if this leads to a decline in biological function. However, absolute SMB values are more difficult to interpret. Target or reference values of SMB are needed for soil quality assessments and to allow ameliorative action to be taken at an appropriate time. However, critical values have not yet been successfully identified for SMB. This paper provides a conceptual framework which outlines how SMB values could be interpreted and measured, with examples provided within an Australian context.
AB - Since 1970, measurement of the soil microbial biomass (SMB) has been widely adopted as a relatively simple means of assessing the impact of environmental and anthropogenic change on soil microorganisms. The SMB is living and dynamic, and its activity is responsible for the regulation of organic matter transformations and associated energy and nutrient cycling in soil. At a gross level, an increase in SMB is considered beneficial, while a decline in SMB may be considered detrimental if this leads to a decline in biological function. However, absolute SMB values are more difficult to interpret. Target or reference values of SMB are needed for soil quality assessments and to allow ameliorative action to be taken at an appropriate time. However, critical values have not yet been successfully identified for SMB. This paper provides a conceptual framework which outlines how SMB values could be interpreted and measured, with examples provided within an Australian context.
KW - fumigation extraction
KW - soil biology
KW - SMB
KW - soil quality
U2 - 10.1071/SR10203
DO - 10.1071/SR10203
M3 - Review article
VL - 49
SP - 287
EP - 304
JO - Soil & Tillage Research
JF - Soil & Tillage Research
SN - 1838-675X
IS - 4
ER -