Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. / Burnett, Katherine; D-Avossa, Giovanni; Close, Alexander et al.
In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 11, 01.04.2016, p. 2218-2232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Burnett, K, D-Avossa, G, Close, A & Sapir, A 2016, 'Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2218-2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

APA

Burnett, K., D-Avossa, G., Close, A., & Sapir, A. (2016). Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2218-2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

CBE

Burnett K, D-Avossa G, Close A, Sapir A. 2016. Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 69(11):2218-2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

MLA

Burnett, Katherine et al. "Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016, 69(11). 2218-2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

VancouverVancouver

Burnett K, D-Avossa G, Close A, Sapir A. Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016 Apr 1;69(11):2218-2232. Epub 2015 Nov 26. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

Author

Burnett, Katherine ; D-Avossa, Giovanni ; Close, Alexander et al. / Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 69, No. 11. pp. 2218-2232.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension

AU - Burnett, Katherine

AU - D-Avossa, Giovanni

AU - Close, Alexander

AU - Sapir, Ayelet

N1 - 2016 Taylor & Francis. This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - A commonly held view in both exogenous and endogenous orienting is that spatial attention is associated with enhanced processing of all stimuli at the attended location. However, we often search for a specific target at a particular location, so an observer should be able to jointly specify the target identity and expected location. Whether attention can bias dimension-specific processes at a particular location is not yet clear. We used a dual task to examine the effects of endogenous spatial cues on the accuracy of perceptual judgments of different dimensions. Participants responded to a motion target and a colour target, presented at the same or different locations. We manipulated a central cue to predict the location of the motion or colour target. While overall performance in the two tasks was comparable, cueing effects were larger for the target whose location was predicted by the cue, implying that when attending a particular location, processing of the likely dimension was preferentially enhanced. Additionally, an asymmetry between the motion and colour tasks was seen; motion was modulated by attention, and colour was not. We conclude that attention has some ability to select a dimension at a particular location, indicating integration of spatial and feature-based attention.

AB - A commonly held view in both exogenous and endogenous orienting is that spatial attention is associated with enhanced processing of all stimuli at the attended location. However, we often search for a specific target at a particular location, so an observer should be able to jointly specify the target identity and expected location. Whether attention can bias dimension-specific processes at a particular location is not yet clear. We used a dual task to examine the effects of endogenous spatial cues on the accuracy of perceptual judgments of different dimensions. Participants responded to a motion target and a colour target, presented at the same or different locations. We manipulated a central cue to predict the location of the motion or colour target. While overall performance in the two tasks was comparable, cueing effects were larger for the target whose location was predicted by the cue, implying that when attending a particular location, processing of the likely dimension was preferentially enhanced. Additionally, an asymmetry between the motion and colour tasks was seen; motion was modulated by attention, and colour was not. We conclude that attention has some ability to select a dimension at a particular location, indicating integration of spatial and feature-based attention.

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1111916

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 2218

EP - 2232

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 11

ER -