Standard Standard

Stakeholder priorities for multi-functional coastal defence developments and steps to effective implementation. / Evans, Ally J; Garrod, Brian; Firth, Louise B; Hawkins, Stephen; Morris-Webb, Elisabeth; Goudge, Harry; Moore, Pippa.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 75, 01.2017, p. 143-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

HarvardHarvard

APA

Evans, A. J., Garrod, B., Firth, L. B., Hawkins, S., Morris-Webb, E., Goudge, H., & Moore, P. (2017). Stakeholder priorities for multi-functional coastal defence developments and steps to effective implementation. Marine Policy, 75, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.006

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Author

Evans, Ally J ; Garrod, Brian ; Firth, Louise B ; Hawkins, Stephen ; Morris-Webb, Elisabeth ; Goudge, Harry ; Moore, Pippa. / Stakeholder priorities for multi-functional coastal defence developments and steps to effective implementation. In: Marine Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 75. pp. 143-155.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder priorities for multi-functional coastal defence developments and steps to effective implementation

AU - Evans, Ally J

AU - Garrod, Brian

AU - Firth, Louise B

AU - Hawkins, Stephen

AU - Morris-Webb, Elisabeth

AU - Goudge, Harry

AU - Moore, Pippa

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - To fulfil international conservation commitments, governments have begun to recognise the need for more proactive marine planning policies, advocating sensitive engineering design that can deliver secondary benefits above and beyond the primary purpose of developments. In response, there is growing scientific interest in novel multi-functional coastal defence structures with built-in secondary ecological and/or socio-economic benefits. To ensure research efforts are invested effectively, it is first necessary to determine what secondary benefits can potentially be built-in to engineered coastal defence structures, and further, which of these benefits would be most desirable. It is unlikely that secondary benefits are perceived in the same way across different stakeholder groups. Further, their order of priority when evaluating different options is unlikely to be consistent, since each option will present a suite of compromises and trade-offs. The aim of this study was to investigate stakeholder attitudes towards multi-functional coastal defence developments across different sector groups. A preliminary questionnaire indicated unanimous support for implementing multi-functional structures in place of traditional single-purpose ones. This preliminary survey informed the design of a Delphi-like study, which revealed a more nuanced and caveated level of support from a panel of experts and practitioners. The study also elicited a degree of consensus that the most desirable secondary benefits that could be built-in to developments would be ecological ones – prioritised over social, economic and technical benefits. This paper synthesises these findings, discusses the perceived barriers that remain, and proposes a stepwise approach to effective implementation of multi-functional coastal defence developments.

AB - To fulfil international conservation commitments, governments have begun to recognise the need for more proactive marine planning policies, advocating sensitive engineering design that can deliver secondary benefits above and beyond the primary purpose of developments. In response, there is growing scientific interest in novel multi-functional coastal defence structures with built-in secondary ecological and/or socio-economic benefits. To ensure research efforts are invested effectively, it is first necessary to determine what secondary benefits can potentially be built-in to engineered coastal defence structures, and further, which of these benefits would be most desirable. It is unlikely that secondary benefits are perceived in the same way across different stakeholder groups. Further, their order of priority when evaluating different options is unlikely to be consistent, since each option will present a suite of compromises and trade-offs. The aim of this study was to investigate stakeholder attitudes towards multi-functional coastal defence developments across different sector groups. A preliminary questionnaire indicated unanimous support for implementing multi-functional structures in place of traditional single-purpose ones. This preliminary survey informed the design of a Delphi-like study, which revealed a more nuanced and caveated level of support from a panel of experts and practitioners. The study also elicited a degree of consensus that the most desirable secondary benefits that could be built-in to developments would be ecological ones – prioritised over social, economic and technical benefits. This paper synthesises these findings, discusses the perceived barriers that remain, and proposes a stepwise approach to effective implementation of multi-functional coastal defence developments.

KW - coastal protection

KW - Delphi technique

KW - green infrastructure

KW - multi-functional

KW - natural capital

KW - stakeholder perceptions

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 143

EP - 155

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -