Standardizing Ecosystem Morphological Traits from 3D Information Sources

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • R. Valbuena
  • B. O'Connor
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)
  • F. Zellweger
    University of Cambridge
  • W. Simonson
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)
  • P. Vihervaara
    Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki
  • M. Maltamo
    University of Eastern Finland
  • C. A. Silva
    University of Maryland
  • D. R. A. Almeida
    University of Sao Paulo
  • F. Danks
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)
  • F. Morsdorf
    University of Zürich
  • G. Chirici
    Università degli Studi di Firenze
  • R. Lucas
    Aberystwyth University
  • D. A. Coomes
    University of Cambridge
  • N. C. Coops
    University of British Columbia, Vancouver
3D-imaging data acquired from a variety of platforms have become critical for ecological and environmental management. However, the use of disparate information sources to produce comprehensive and standardized global products is hindered by a lack of harmonization and terminology around ecosystem structure.
We propose a sensor- and platform-independent framework which effectively distils the wealth of 3D information into concise ecosystem morphological traits – height, cover, and structural complexity – easy to conceptualize by ecologists and conservation stakeholders lacking remote sensing background.
The conceptual disaggregation of ecosystem structure would contribute to defining and monitoring essential biodiversity variables obtained from 3D imaging that can be used to inform progress towards the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and other international policy targets.
3D-imaging technologies provide measurements of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems’ structure, key for biodiversity studies. However, the practical use of these observations globally faces practical challenges. First, available 3D data are geographically biased, with significant gaps in the tropics. Second, no data source provides, by itself, global coverage at a suitable temporal recurrence. Thus, global monitoring initiatives, such as assessment of essential biodiversity variables (EBVs), will necessarily have to involve the combination of disparate data sets. We propose a standardized framework of ecosystem morphological traits – height, cover, and structural complexity – that could enable monitoring of globally consistent EBVs at regional scales, by flexibly integrating different information sources – satellites, aircrafts, drones, or ground data – allowing global biodiversity targets relating to ecosystem structure to be monitored and regularly reported.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)656-667
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume35
Issue number8
Early online date15 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations