Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot. / Robinson, Janine; Griffiths, Richard; Fraser, Iain et al.
In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 23, No. 1, 13, 21.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Robinson, J, Griffiths, R, Fraser, I, Raharimalala, J, Roberts, D & St John, FAV 2017, 'Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot', Ecology and Society, vol. 23, no. 1, 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09821-230113

APA

Robinson, J., Griffiths, R., Fraser, I., Raharimalala, J., Roberts, D., & St John, F. A. V. (2017). Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecology and Society, 23(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09821-230113

CBE

Robinson J, Griffiths R, Fraser I, Raharimalala J, Roberts D, St John FAV. 2017. Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecology and Society. 23(1):Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09821-230113

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Robinson J, Griffiths R, Fraser I, Raharimalala J, Roberts D, St John FAV. Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecology and Society. 2017 Nov 21;23(1):13. doi: 10.5751/ES-09821-230113

Author

Robinson, Janine ; Griffiths, Richard ; Fraser, Iain et al. / Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot. In: Ecology and Society. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 1.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supplying the wildlife trade as a livelihood strategy in a biodiversity hotspot

AU - Robinson, Janine

AU - Griffiths, Richard

AU - Fraser, Iain

AU - Raharimalala, Jessica

AU - Roberts, David

AU - St John, Freya A. V.

PY - 2017/11/21

Y1 - 2017/11/21

N2 - Much of the global wildlife trade is sourced from biodiversity-rich developing countries. These often have high levels of poverty and habitat loss, particularly in rural areas where many depend on natural resources. However, wildlife collection may incentivize local people to conserve habitats that support their livelihoods. Here we examined the contribution of the commercial collection of live animals to rural livelihoods in Madagascar, one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots. Using questionnaires, we investigated the prevalence, profitability relative to other livelihood activities, and local importance of the trade, and its capacity to provide incentives for conservation. Thirteen percent of households were engaged in live animal collection in the study area (~5% trapped reptiles and amphibians and the remainder trapped invertebrates). This formed part of a diverse livelihood strategy, and was more profitable than other activities (in terms of returns per unit of effort), with median earnings of ~US$100 per season (~25% of Gross National Income per year). However, trapping was part-time, usually undertaken by poorer members of the community, and often perceived as opportunistic, risky, and financially unreliable. Further, trappers and non-trappers held similar perceptions regarding conservation, suggesting wildlife trade currently does not incentivize enhanced stewardship of traded species and their habitats. Our study brings together a range of methodologies to present the most comprehensive insights into livelihoods and conservation in poor rural communities involved in the commercial collection of live animals to supply international trade. This improved understanding of the wider socioeconomic dimensions of wildlife trade can inform policy and management interventions for both the threats and opportunities associated with global trade in biodiversity both in Madagascar and more generally

AB - Much of the global wildlife trade is sourced from biodiversity-rich developing countries. These often have high levels of poverty and habitat loss, particularly in rural areas where many depend on natural resources. However, wildlife collection may incentivize local people to conserve habitats that support their livelihoods. Here we examined the contribution of the commercial collection of live animals to rural livelihoods in Madagascar, one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots. Using questionnaires, we investigated the prevalence, profitability relative to other livelihood activities, and local importance of the trade, and its capacity to provide incentives for conservation. Thirteen percent of households were engaged in live animal collection in the study area (~5% trapped reptiles and amphibians and the remainder trapped invertebrates). This formed part of a diverse livelihood strategy, and was more profitable than other activities (in terms of returns per unit of effort), with median earnings of ~US$100 per season (~25% of Gross National Income per year). However, trapping was part-time, usually undertaken by poorer members of the community, and often perceived as opportunistic, risky, and financially unreliable. Further, trappers and non-trappers held similar perceptions regarding conservation, suggesting wildlife trade currently does not incentivize enhanced stewardship of traded species and their habitats. Our study brings together a range of methodologies to present the most comprehensive insights into livelihoods and conservation in poor rural communities involved in the commercial collection of live animals to supply international trade. This improved understanding of the wider socioeconomic dimensions of wildlife trade can inform policy and management interventions for both the threats and opportunities associated with global trade in biodiversity both in Madagascar and more generally

U2 - 10.5751/ES-09821-230113

DO - 10.5751/ES-09821-230113

M3 - Article

VL - 23

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

M1 - 13

ER -