Sympatric speciation in the genomic era

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Sympatric speciation in the genomic era. / Foote, Andrew.
In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 33, No. 2, 02.2018, p. 85-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Foote, A 2018, 'Sympatric speciation in the genomic era', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

APA

Foote, A. (2018). Sympatric speciation in the genomic era. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 33(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

CBE

Foote A. 2018. Sympatric speciation in the genomic era. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 33(2):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

MLA

Foote, Andrew. "Sympatric speciation in the genomic era". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2018, 33(2). 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

VancouverVancouver

Foote A. Sympatric speciation in the genomic era. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2018 Feb;33(2):85-95. Epub 2017 Nov 30. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

Author

Foote, Andrew. / Sympatric speciation in the genomic era. In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 85-95.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sympatric speciation in the genomic era

AU - Foote, Andrew

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Sympatric speciation has been of key interest to biologists investigating how natural and sexual selection drive speciation without the confounding variable of geographic isolation. The advent of the genomic era has provided a more nuanced and quantitative understanding of the different and often complex modes of speciation by which sympatric sister taxa arose, and a reassessment of some of the most compelling empirical case studies of sympatric speciation. However, I argue that genomic studies based on contemporary populations may never be able to provide unequivocal evidence of true primary sympatric speciation, and there is a need to incorporate palaeogenomic studies into this field. This inability to robustly distinguish cases of primary and secondary ‘divergence with gene flow’ may be inconsequential, as both are useful for understanding the role of large effect barrier loci in the progression from localised genic isolation to genome-wide reproductive isolation. I argue that they can be of equivalent interest due to shared underlying mechanisms driving divergence and potentially leaving similar patterns of coalescence.

AB - Sympatric speciation has been of key interest to biologists investigating how natural and sexual selection drive speciation without the confounding variable of geographic isolation. The advent of the genomic era has provided a more nuanced and quantitative understanding of the different and often complex modes of speciation by which sympatric sister taxa arose, and a reassessment of some of the most compelling empirical case studies of sympatric speciation. However, I argue that genomic studies based on contemporary populations may never be able to provide unequivocal evidence of true primary sympatric speciation, and there is a need to incorporate palaeogenomic studies into this field. This inability to robustly distinguish cases of primary and secondary ‘divergence with gene flow’ may be inconsequential, as both are useful for understanding the role of large effect barrier loci in the progression from localised genic isolation to genome-wide reproductive isolation. I argue that they can be of equivalent interest due to shared underlying mechanisms driving divergence and potentially leaving similar patterns of coalescence.

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 85

EP - 95

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 2

ER -