That awkward ‘Moment’: Gallifreyan moratoria on weapons of mass destruction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

That awkward ‘Moment’: Gallifreyan moratoria on weapons of mass destruction. / Jones, Craig.
In: Journal of Popular Television, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 183-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Jones C. That awkward ‘Moment’: Gallifreyan moratoria on weapons of mass destruction. Journal of Popular Television. 2018 Jun 1;6(2):183-195. doi: 10.1386/jptv.6.2.183_1

Author

Jones, Craig. / That awkward ‘Moment’: Gallifreyan moratoria on weapons of mass destruction. In: Journal of Popular Television. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 183-195.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - That awkward ‘Moment’: Gallifreyan moratoria on weapons of mass destruction

AU - Jones, Craig

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Drawing on the ideas of Jonathan Schell with reference to the proliferation of nuclear weapons as articulated in The Fate of the Earth (1982) and The Abolition (1984), this article will explore the representations of weapons of mass destruction alluded to in the Doctor Who (1963–89, 1996, 2005–present) episode ‘The Day of the Doctor’ (2013). It is argued that, whereas violations of the long-standing moratorium against changing history first articulated in the 1960s have been couched in apologetic terms, the comparative lack of a similar apologia in the case of the ‘forbidden weapons’ reflects changing attitudes towards the moral absolutism encapsulated by Schell’s thesis, itself largely a product of the current febrile state of discourse over the future of warfare.

AB - Drawing on the ideas of Jonathan Schell with reference to the proliferation of nuclear weapons as articulated in The Fate of the Earth (1982) and The Abolition (1984), this article will explore the representations of weapons of mass destruction alluded to in the Doctor Who (1963–89, 1996, 2005–present) episode ‘The Day of the Doctor’ (2013). It is argued that, whereas violations of the long-standing moratorium against changing history first articulated in the 1960s have been couched in apologetic terms, the comparative lack of a similar apologia in the case of the ‘forbidden weapons’ reflects changing attitudes towards the moral absolutism encapsulated by Schell’s thesis, itself largely a product of the current febrile state of discourse over the future of warfare.

KW - Science fiction

KW - television

U2 - 10.1386/jptv.6.2.183_1

DO - 10.1386/jptv.6.2.183_1

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 183

EP - 195

JO - Journal of Popular Television

JF - Journal of Popular Television

IS - 2

ER -