Standard Standard

The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. / Amulen, Deborah Ruth; D’Haese, Marijke; Ahikiriza, Elizabeth et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 2, 24.02.2017, p. e0172820.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Amulen, DR, D’Haese, M, Ahikiriza, E, Agea, JG, Jacobs, FJ, de Graaf, DC, Smagghe, G & Cross, P 2017, 'The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa', PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. e0172820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

APA

Amulen, D. R., D’Haese, M., Ahikiriza, E., Agea, J. G., Jacobs, F. J., de Graaf, D. C., Smagghe, G., & Cross, P. (2017). The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

CBE

Amulen DR, D’Haese M, Ahikiriza E, Agea JG, Jacobs FJ, de Graaf DC, Smagghe G, Cross P. 2017. The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 12(2):e0172820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Amulen DR, D’Haese M, Ahikiriza E, Agea JG, Jacobs FJ, de Graaf DC et al. The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

Author

Amulen, Deborah Ruth ; D’Haese, Marijke ; Ahikiriza, Elizabeth et al. / The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. In: PLoS ONE. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. e0172820.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa

AU - Amulen, Deborah Ruth

AU - D’Haese, Marijke

AU - Ahikiriza, Elizabeth

AU - Agea, Jacob Godfrey

AU - Jacobs, Frans J.

AU - de Graaf, Dirk C.

AU - Smagghe, Guy

AU - Cross, Paul

PY - 2017/2/24

Y1 - 2017/2/24

N2 - The potential of beekeeping to mitigate the exposure of rural sub-Sahara African farmers to economic stochasticity has been widely promoted by an array of development agencies. Robust outcome indicators of the success of beekeeping to improve household well-being are unfortunately lacking. This study aimed to identify the key drivers and barriers of beekeeping adoption at the household level, and quantified the associated income contribution in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Beekeepers were generally the most economically disadvantaged people in the study areas and tended to adopt beekeeping following contact with non-government organisations and access to training. Whilst incomes were not statistically lower than their non-beekeeping counterparts; their mean household well-being scores were significantly lower than non-beekeeping households. The inability of beekeeping to significantly improve well-being status can in part be attributed to a lack of both training in bee husbandry and protective equipment provision such as suits, gloves and smokers. These are critical tools for beekeepers as they provide the necessary confidence to manage honey bees. Rather than focussing solely on the socio-economic conditions of farmers to effectively adopt beekeeping, future research should also attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of development agencies’ provision to the beekeeping sector.

AB - The potential of beekeeping to mitigate the exposure of rural sub-Sahara African farmers to economic stochasticity has been widely promoted by an array of development agencies. Robust outcome indicators of the success of beekeeping to improve household well-being are unfortunately lacking. This study aimed to identify the key drivers and barriers of beekeeping adoption at the household level, and quantified the associated income contribution in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Beekeepers were generally the most economically disadvantaged people in the study areas and tended to adopt beekeeping following contact with non-government organisations and access to training. Whilst incomes were not statistically lower than their non-beekeeping counterparts; their mean household well-being scores were significantly lower than non-beekeeping households. The inability of beekeeping to significantly improve well-being status can in part be attributed to a lack of both training in bee husbandry and protective equipment provision such as suits, gloves and smokers. These are critical tools for beekeepers as they provide the necessary confidence to manage honey bees. Rather than focussing solely on the socio-economic conditions of farmers to effectively adopt beekeeping, future research should also attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of development agencies’ provision to the beekeeping sector.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172820

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - e0172820

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

ER -