Standard Standard

The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy: a critical literature review. / Toms, Gillian; Williams, Lynne; Rycroft-Malone, Joanne et al.
In: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 12.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Toms, G, Williams, L, Rycroft-Malone, J, Swales, M & Feigenbaum, J 2019, 'The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy: a critical literature review', Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, vol. 6, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-019-0102-7

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Toms G, Williams L, Rycroft-Malone J, Swales M, Feigenbaum J. The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy: a critical literature review. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation. 2019 Feb 12;6(2). doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0102-7

Author

Toms, Gillian ; Williams, Lynne ; Rycroft-Malone, Joanne et al. / The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy : a critical literature review. In: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 2.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and theoretical application of an implementation framework for dialectical behaviour therapy

T2 - a critical literature review

AU - Toms, Gillian

AU - Williams, Lynne

AU - Rycroft-Malone, Joanne

AU - Swales, Michaela

AU - Feigenbaum, Janet

PY - 2019/2/12

Y1 - 2019/2/12

N2 - BackgroundDialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is a third wave behaviour therapy combining behaviour based components with elements of mindfulness. Although DBT effectiveness has been explored, relatively little attention has been given to its implementation. Frameworks are often the basis for gathering information about implementation and can also direct how the implementation of an intervention is conducted. Using existing implementation frameworks, this critical literature review scoped the DBT implementation literature to develop and refine a bespoke DBT implementation framework.Method and resultsThe initial framework was developed by consolidating existing implementation frameworks and published guidance on DBT implementation. The critical literature review retrieved papers from Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and the reference lists of included papers. Framework elements were used as codes which were applied to the literature and guided the synthesis. Findings from the synthesis refined the framework.The critical literature review retrieved 60 papers but only 14 of these explicitly focused on implementation. The DBT implementation framework captured all the execution barriers and facilitators described in the literature. However, the evidence synthesis led to a more parsimonious framework as some elements (e.g., research and published guidance) were seldom discussed in DBT implementation.ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first published review exploring DBT implementation. The literature synthesis suggests some tentative recommendations which warrant further exploration. For instance, if DBT implementation is not pre-planned, having someone in the organisation who champions DBT can be advantageous. However, as the literature is limited and has methodological limitations, further prospective studies of DBT implementation are needed.

AB - BackgroundDialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is a third wave behaviour therapy combining behaviour based components with elements of mindfulness. Although DBT effectiveness has been explored, relatively little attention has been given to its implementation. Frameworks are often the basis for gathering information about implementation and can also direct how the implementation of an intervention is conducted. Using existing implementation frameworks, this critical literature review scoped the DBT implementation literature to develop and refine a bespoke DBT implementation framework.Method and resultsThe initial framework was developed by consolidating existing implementation frameworks and published guidance on DBT implementation. The critical literature review retrieved papers from Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and the reference lists of included papers. Framework elements were used as codes which were applied to the literature and guided the synthesis. Findings from the synthesis refined the framework.The critical literature review retrieved 60 papers but only 14 of these explicitly focused on implementation. The DBT implementation framework captured all the execution barriers and facilitators described in the literature. However, the evidence synthesis led to a more parsimonious framework as some elements (e.g., research and published guidance) were seldom discussed in DBT implementation.ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first published review exploring DBT implementation. The literature synthesis suggests some tentative recommendations which warrant further exploration. For instance, if DBT implementation is not pre-planned, having someone in the organisation who champions DBT can be advantageous. However, as the literature is limited and has methodological limitations, further prospective studies of DBT implementation are needed.

KW - Dialectical behaviour therapy

KW - Implementation

KW - Psychological therapy

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1186/s40479-019-0102-7

DO - 10.1186/s40479-019-0102-7

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

JF - Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

SN - 2051-6673

IS - 2

ER -