Standard Standard

The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults. / Neal, Bradley S.; McManus, Chris J.; Bradley, Warren J. et al.
In: Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol. 60, 03.2023, p. 9-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

Neal, B. S., McManus, C. J., Bradley, W. J., Leaney, S. F., Murray, K., & Clark, N. C. (2023). The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults. Physical Therapy in Sport, 60, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Neal BS, McManus CJ, Bradley WJ, Leaney SF, Murray K, Clark NC. The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2023 Mar;60:9-16. Epub 2023 Jan 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006

Author

Neal, Bradley S. ; McManus, Chris J. ; Bradley, Warren J. et al. / The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults. In: Physical Therapy in Sport. 2023 ; Vol. 60. pp. 9-16.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults

AU - Neal, Bradley S.

AU - McManus, Chris J.

AU - Bradley, Warren J.

AU - Leaney, Sam F.

AU - Murray, Kelly

AU - Clark, Nicholas C.

PY - 2023/3

Y1 - 2023/3

N2 - ObjectivesExplore the feasibility of lower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training.DesignObservational study.SettingHuman performance laboratory.ParticipantsHealthy males with no experience of BFR-training.Main outcome measuresFeasibility was determined by a priori thresholds for recruitment, adherence, and data collection. Safety was determined by measuring BFR torniquet pressure and the incidence of side effects. Efficacy was determined by measuring body anthropometry and knee isokinetic dynamometry. Feasibility and safety outcomes were reported descriptively or as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with mean change, 95% CIs, and effect sizes for efficacy outcomes.ResultsTwelve participants (mean age 24.8 years [6.5]) were successfully recruited; 11 completed the study. 134/136 sessions were completed (adherence = 98.5%) and 100% of data were collected. There was one event of excessive pain during exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%), two events of excessive pain post-exercise (1.5%, 95% CI 0.4%, 5.5%), and one event of persistent paraesthesia post-exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%). Mean maximal BFR torniquet pressure was ConclusionsLower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training is feasible, has no signal of important harm, and could be used independently.

AB - ObjectivesExplore the feasibility of lower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training.DesignObservational study.SettingHuman performance laboratory.ParticipantsHealthy males with no experience of BFR-training.Main outcome measuresFeasibility was determined by a priori thresholds for recruitment, adherence, and data collection. Safety was determined by measuring BFR torniquet pressure and the incidence of side effects. Efficacy was determined by measuring body anthropometry and knee isokinetic dynamometry. Feasibility and safety outcomes were reported descriptively or as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with mean change, 95% CIs, and effect sizes for efficacy outcomes.ResultsTwelve participants (mean age 24.8 years [6.5]) were successfully recruited; 11 completed the study. 134/136 sessions were completed (adherence = 98.5%) and 100% of data were collected. There was one event of excessive pain during exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%), two events of excessive pain post-exercise (1.5%, 95% CI 0.4%, 5.5%), and one event of persistent paraesthesia post-exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%). Mean maximal BFR torniquet pressure was ConclusionsLower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training is feasible, has no signal of important harm, and could be used independently.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 9

EP - 16

JO - Physical Therapy in Sport

JF - Physical Therapy in Sport

ER -