The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol. 60, 03.2023, p. 9-16.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of lower limb garment-integrated blood flow restriction training in healthy adults
AU - Neal, Bradley S.
AU - McManus, Chris J.
AU - Bradley, Warren J.
AU - Leaney, Sam F.
AU - Murray, Kelly
AU - Clark, Nicholas C.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - ObjectivesExplore the feasibility of lower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training.DesignObservational study.SettingHuman performance laboratory.ParticipantsHealthy males with no experience of BFR-training.Main outcome measuresFeasibility was determined by a priori thresholds for recruitment, adherence, and data collection. Safety was determined by measuring BFR torniquet pressure and the incidence of side effects. Efficacy was determined by measuring body anthropometry and knee isokinetic dynamometry. Feasibility and safety outcomes were reported descriptively or as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with mean change, 95% CIs, and effect sizes for efficacy outcomes.ResultsTwelve participants (mean age 24.8 years [6.5]) were successfully recruited; 11 completed the study. 134/136 sessions were completed (adherence = 98.5%) and 100% of data were collected. There was one event of excessive pain during exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%), two events of excessive pain post-exercise (1.5%, 95% CI 0.4%, 5.5%), and one event of persistent paraesthesia post-exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%). Mean maximal BFR torniquet pressure was ConclusionsLower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training is feasible, has no signal of important harm, and could be used independently.
AB - ObjectivesExplore the feasibility of lower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training.DesignObservational study.SettingHuman performance laboratory.ParticipantsHealthy males with no experience of BFR-training.Main outcome measuresFeasibility was determined by a priori thresholds for recruitment, adherence, and data collection. Safety was determined by measuring BFR torniquet pressure and the incidence of side effects. Efficacy was determined by measuring body anthropometry and knee isokinetic dynamometry. Feasibility and safety outcomes were reported descriptively or as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with mean change, 95% CIs, and effect sizes for efficacy outcomes.ResultsTwelve participants (mean age 24.8 years [6.5]) were successfully recruited; 11 completed the study. 134/136 sessions were completed (adherence = 98.5%) and 100% of data were collected. There was one event of excessive pain during exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%), two events of excessive pain post-exercise (1.5%, 95% CI 0.4%, 5.5%), and one event of persistent paraesthesia post-exercise (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0%, 4.0%). Mean maximal BFR torniquet pressure was ConclusionsLower-limb garment-integrated BFR-training is feasible, has no signal of important harm, and could be used independently.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.01.006
M3 - Article
VL - 60
SP - 9
EP - 16
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
ER -