The fecundity costs of building domed nests in birds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

DOI

Animal nests provide a beneficial environment for offspring development and as such contribute to fitness. Gathering and transporting materials to construct nests is energetically costly, but the life history trade-offs associated with the types of nests built are largely unknown. Who contributes to building the nest could also mediate these trade-offs, as building a nest as a couple is expected to be less costly per individual than building alone. Using a comparative analysis on 227 songbird species globally, we found a fecundity cost associated with the type of nest a species builds. Species that build domed nests produce fewer broods per year than species building cups or platforms. Dome nesting species also have larger clutch sizes than open nesting species, but only when the nest is built by a couple and not when females build nests alone. This suggests that building domed nests represents a trade-off with investment in young, especially when females are solely responsible for nest building. More broadly, our results could explain macroevolutionary patterns, such as the recent finding that females, building on their own, more often build open cup rather than domed nests.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1378-1385
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume37
Issue number11
Early online date1 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024
View graph of relations