The impact of securitization on credit rationing: Empirical evidence
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 20, 16.07.2015, p. 36-50.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of securitization on credit rationing: Empirical evidence
AU - Carbo-Valverde, S.
AU - Degryse, H.
AU - Rodriguez-Fernandez, F.
PY - 2015/7/16
Y1 - 2015/7/16
N2 - We study whether banks’ involvement into different types of securitization activity – asset backed securities (ABS) and covered bonds – in Spain influences credit supply before and during the financial crisis. While both ABS and covered bonds were hit by the crisis, the former were hit more severely. Employing a disequilibrium model to identify credit rationing, we find that firms with banks that were more involved in securitization see their credit constraints more relaxed in normal periods. In contrast, only greater covered bonds issuance reduces credit rationing during crisis periods whereas ABS aggravates these firms’ credit rationing in crisis periods. Our results are in line with the theoretical predictions that a securitization instrument that retains risk (covered bond) may induce a more prudent risk behavior of banks than an instrument that provides risk transferring (ABS).
AB - We study whether banks’ involvement into different types of securitization activity – asset backed securities (ABS) and covered bonds – in Spain influences credit supply before and during the financial crisis. While both ABS and covered bonds were hit by the crisis, the former were hit more severely. Employing a disequilibrium model to identify credit rationing, we find that firms with banks that were more involved in securitization see their credit constraints more relaxed in normal periods. In contrast, only greater covered bonds issuance reduces credit rationing during crisis periods whereas ABS aggravates these firms’ credit rationing in crisis periods. Our results are in line with the theoretical predictions that a securitization instrument that retains risk (covered bond) may induce a more prudent risk behavior of banks than an instrument that provides risk transferring (ABS).
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.06.004
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 36
EP - 50
JO - Journal of Financial Stability
JF - Journal of Financial Stability
SN - 1572-3089
ER -