Research Portal

The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard Standard

The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature. / Johnson, David.
In: Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 10.09.2016, p. 184-202.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

HarvardHarvard

Johnson, D 2016, 'The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature', Journal of Pentecostal Theology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02502003

APA

Johnson, D. (2016). The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature. Journal of Pentecostal Theology, 25(2), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02502003

CBE

Johnson D. 2016. The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 25(2):184-202. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02502003

MLA

Johnson, David. "The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature". Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 2016, 25(2). 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02502003

VancouverVancouver

Johnson D. The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 2016 Sept 10;25(2):184-202. doi: 10.1163/17455251-02502003

Author

Johnson, David. / The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature. In: Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 184-202.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature

AU - Johnson, David

PY - 2016/9/10

Y1 - 2016/9/10

N2 - This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War I.

AB - This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War I.

U2 - 10.1163/17455251-02502003

DO - 10.1163/17455251-02502003

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 184

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Pentecostal Theology

JF - Journal of Pentecostal Theology

SN - 0966-7369

IS - 2

ER -