The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC): reflections on implementation and development
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 28, 08.2019, p. 6-10.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Mindfulness-Based Interventions
T2 - Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC): reflections on implementation and development
AU - Crane, Rebecca
AU - Kuyken, W.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) is a tool for supporting good practice in mindfulness-based teaching, training supervision and research contexts. It has been taken up in practice in teacher training organizations worldwide. The MBI:TAC sits within the wider consideration within research contexts of building methodological rigor by developing robust systems for ensuring intervention integrity. Research on the tool is at an early stage and needs development. The process of implementation needs careful attention to ensure reliability and good practice. Future research is needed on the tool’s reliability, validity and sensitivity to change, and on the relationships between mindfulness-based teaching, participant outcomes and key contextual factors, including the influence of participant population, culture and context.
AB - The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) is a tool for supporting good practice in mindfulness-based teaching, training supervision and research contexts. It has been taken up in practice in teacher training organizations worldwide. The MBI:TAC sits within the wider consideration within research contexts of building methodological rigor by developing robust systems for ensuring intervention integrity. Research on the tool is at an early stage and needs development. The process of implementation needs careful attention to ensure reliability and good practice. Future research is needed on the tool’s reliability, validity and sensitivity to change, and on the relationships between mindfulness-based teaching, participant outcomes and key contextual factors, including the influence of participant population, culture and context.
U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.004
M3 - Article
VL - 28
SP - 6
EP - 10
JO - Current Opinion in Psychology
JF - Current Opinion in Psychology
SN - 2352-250X
ER -