The presence of territorial damselfish predicts choosy client species richness at cleaning stations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 28.03.2023, p. 269-277.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The presence of territorial damselfish predicts choosy client species richness at cleaning stations
AU - Dunkley, Katie
AU - Whittey, Kathryn E.
AU - Ellison, Amy
AU - Perkins, Sarah E.
AU - Cable, Jo
AU - Herbert-Read, James
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
PY - 2023/3/28
Y1 - 2023/3/28
N2 - Mutualisms are driven by partners deciding to interact with one another to gain specific services or rewards. As predicted by biological market theory, partners should be selected based on the likelihood, quality, reward level, and or services each partner can offer. Third-party species that are not directly involved in the interaction, however, may indirectly affect the occurrence and or quality of the services provided, thereby affecting which partners are selected or avoided. We investigated how different clients of the sharknose goby (Elacatinus evelynae) cleaner fish were distributed across cleaning stations, and asked what characteristics, relating to biological market theory, affected this distribution. Through quantifying the visitation and cleaning patterns of client fish that can choose which cleaning station(s) to visit, we found that the relative species richness of visiting clients at stations was negatively associated with the presence of disruptive territorial damselfish at the station. Our study highlights, therefore, the need to consider the indirect effects of third-party species and their interactions (e.g., agonistic interactions) when attempting to understand mutualistic interactions between species. Moreover, we highlight how cooperative interactions may be indirectly governed by external partners.
AB - Mutualisms are driven by partners deciding to interact with one another to gain specific services or rewards. As predicted by biological market theory, partners should be selected based on the likelihood, quality, reward level, and or services each partner can offer. Third-party species that are not directly involved in the interaction, however, may indirectly affect the occurrence and or quality of the services provided, thereby affecting which partners are selected or avoided. We investigated how different clients of the sharknose goby (Elacatinus evelynae) cleaner fish were distributed across cleaning stations, and asked what characteristics, relating to biological market theory, affected this distribution. Through quantifying the visitation and cleaning patterns of client fish that can choose which cleaning station(s) to visit, we found that the relative species richness of visiting clients at stations was negatively associated with the presence of disruptive territorial damselfish at the station. Our study highlights, therefore, the need to consider the indirect effects of third-party species and their interactions (e.g., agonistic interactions) when attempting to understand mutualistic interactions between species. Moreover, we highlight how cooperative interactions may be indirectly governed by external partners.
KW - Biological Market Theory
KW - Cleaner Fish
KW - Ecological Networks
KW - Elacatinus Evelynae
KW - Mutualism
KW - Partner Choice
U2 - 10.1093/beheco/arac122
DO - 10.1093/beheco/arac122
M3 - Article
C2 - 36998993
VL - 34
SP - 269
EP - 277
JO - Behavioral Ecology
JF - Behavioral Ecology
SN - 1045-2249
IS - 2
ER -