The Real Earnings Management Gap Between Private and Public Firms: Evidence from Europe
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 49, 100506, 12.2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Real Earnings Management Gap Between Private and Public Firms: Evidence from Europe
AU - Yang, Jingwen
AU - Hemmings, Danial
AU - Jaafar, Aziz
AU - Jackson, Richard
N1 - Embargo period is 24 months from date article is formally published online.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Employing a comprehensive dataset spanning eleven European countries, we provide novel insights on how country-level institutional factors affect differences in the extent of REM activity by publicly listed and privately held firms (the ‘REM gap’), thus explaining why the public-private firm REM gap varies systematically across countries. Exploring the impact of country-level governance and legal environment, we observe the REM gap to be greater in weaker market settings and in jurisdictions with higher book-tax conformity, despite REM levels overall typically being lower in such jurisdictions. While overall REM levels are positively related with the strength of investor protection and the extent of disclosure requirements and negatively related with ownership concentration levels, these factors play only a modest role in explaining variations in the REM gap. Our broad-based evidence also provides consistent support for the existence internationally of a ‘partial substitution effect’: increased (decreased) REM activity is off-set to some extent, by not wholly, by reduced (increased) accruals-based earnings management activity. Our findings have important implications in terms of the comparability of financial statement information provided by public and private firms.
AB - Employing a comprehensive dataset spanning eleven European countries, we provide novel insights on how country-level institutional factors affect differences in the extent of REM activity by publicly listed and privately held firms (the ‘REM gap’), thus explaining why the public-private firm REM gap varies systematically across countries. Exploring the impact of country-level governance and legal environment, we observe the REM gap to be greater in weaker market settings and in jurisdictions with higher book-tax conformity, despite REM levels overall typically being lower in such jurisdictions. While overall REM levels are positively related with the strength of investor protection and the extent of disclosure requirements and negatively related with ownership concentration levels, these factors play only a modest role in explaining variations in the REM gap. Our broad-based evidence also provides consistent support for the existence internationally of a ‘partial substitution effect’: increased (decreased) REM activity is off-set to some extent, by not wholly, by reduced (increased) accruals-based earnings management activity. Our findings have important implications in terms of the comparability of financial statement information provided by public and private firms.
KW - Real earnings management
KW - Public versus private firms
KW - REM gap
KW - Accruals earnings management
KW - Institutional environment
U2 - 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100506
DO - 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100506
M3 - Article
VL - 49
JO - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
JF - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
SN - 1061-9518
M1 - 100506
ER -