The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. / Wainwright, Megan; Islamiah Zahroh, Rana ; Tunçalp, Özge et al.
In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, 77, 25.07.2023, p. 77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Wainwright, M, Islamiah Zahroh, R, Tunçalp, Ö, Booth, A, Noyes, J, Chen, W, Munte-Kaas, H & Lewin, S 2023, 'The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting', Health Research Policy and Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, 77, pp. 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

APA

Wainwright, M., Islamiah Zahroh, R., Tunçalp, Ö., Booth, A., Noyes, J., Chen, W., Munte-Kaas, H., & Lewin, S. (2023). The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21(1), 77. Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

CBE

Wainwright M, Islamiah Zahroh R, Tunçalp Ö, Booth A, Noyes J, Chen W, Munte-Kaas H, Lewin S. 2023. The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. Health Research Policy and Systems. 21(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Wainwright M, Islamiah Zahroh R, Tunçalp Ö, Booth A, Noyes J, Chen W et al. The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2023 Jul 25;21(1):77. 77. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

Author

Wainwright, Megan ; Islamiah Zahroh, Rana ; Tunçalp, Özge et al. / The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2023 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 77.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting

AU - Wainwright, Megan

AU - Islamiah Zahroh, Rana

AU - Tunçalp, Özge

AU - Booth, Andrew

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Chen, Weilong

AU - Munte-Kaas, Heather

AU - Lewin, Simon

N1 - © 2023. World Health Organization.

PY - 2023/7/25

Y1 - 2023/7/25

N2 - BACKGROUND: GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) is a methodological approach to systematically and transparently assess how much confidence decision makers can place in individual review findings from qualitative evidence syntheses. The number of reviews applying GRADE-CERQual is rapidly expanding in guideline and other decision-making contexts. The objectives of this evaluation were, firstly, to describe the uptake of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis by review authors and, secondly, to assess both reporting of and fidelity to the approach.METHODS: The evaluation had two parts. Part 1 was a citation analysis and descriptive overview of the literature citing GRADE-CERQual. Authors worked together to code and chart the citations, first by title and abstract and second by full text. Part 2 was an assessment and analysis of fidelity to, and reporting of, the GRADE-CERQual approach in included reviews. We developed fidelity and reporting questions and answers based on the most recent guidance for GRADE-CERQual and then used NVivo12 to document assessments in a spreadsheet and code full-text PDF articles for any concerns that had been identified. Our assessments were exported to Excel and we applied count formulae to explore patterns in the data. We employed a qualitative content analysis approach in NVivo12 to sub-coding all the data illustrating concerns for each reporting and fidelity criteria.RESULTS: 233 studies have applied the GRADE-CERQual approach, with most (n = 225, 96.5%) in the field of health research. Many studies (n = 97/233, 41.6%) were excluded from full fidelity and reporting assessment because they demonstrated a serious misapplication of GRADE-CERQual, for example interpreting it as a quality appraisal tool for primary studies or reviews. For the remaining studies that applied GRADE-CERQual to assess confidence in review findings, the main areas of reporting concern involved terminology, labelling and completeness. Fidelity concerns were identified in more than half of all studies assessed.CONCLUSIONS: GRADE-CERQual is being used widely within qualitative evidence syntheses and there are common reporting and fidelity issues. Most of these are avoidable and we highlight these as gaps in knowledge and guidance for applying the GRADE-CERQual approach.

AB - BACKGROUND: GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) is a methodological approach to systematically and transparently assess how much confidence decision makers can place in individual review findings from qualitative evidence syntheses. The number of reviews applying GRADE-CERQual is rapidly expanding in guideline and other decision-making contexts. The objectives of this evaluation were, firstly, to describe the uptake of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis by review authors and, secondly, to assess both reporting of and fidelity to the approach.METHODS: The evaluation had two parts. Part 1 was a citation analysis and descriptive overview of the literature citing GRADE-CERQual. Authors worked together to code and chart the citations, first by title and abstract and second by full text. Part 2 was an assessment and analysis of fidelity to, and reporting of, the GRADE-CERQual approach in included reviews. We developed fidelity and reporting questions and answers based on the most recent guidance for GRADE-CERQual and then used NVivo12 to document assessments in a spreadsheet and code full-text PDF articles for any concerns that had been identified. Our assessments were exported to Excel and we applied count formulae to explore patterns in the data. We employed a qualitative content analysis approach in NVivo12 to sub-coding all the data illustrating concerns for each reporting and fidelity criteria.RESULTS: 233 studies have applied the GRADE-CERQual approach, with most (n = 225, 96.5%) in the field of health research. Many studies (n = 97/233, 41.6%) were excluded from full fidelity and reporting assessment because they demonstrated a serious misapplication of GRADE-CERQual, for example interpreting it as a quality appraisal tool for primary studies or reviews. For the remaining studies that applied GRADE-CERQual to assess confidence in review findings, the main areas of reporting concern involved terminology, labelling and completeness. Fidelity concerns were identified in more than half of all studies assessed.CONCLUSIONS: GRADE-CERQual is being used widely within qualitative evidence syntheses and there are common reporting and fidelity issues. Most of these are avoidable and we highlight these as gaps in knowledge and guidance for applying the GRADE-CERQual approach.

KW - Biomedical Research

KW - Data Accuracy

KW - Decision Making

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Humans

KW - Publishing

KW - Qualitative Research

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

DO - 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 37491226

VL - 21

SP - 77

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

IS - 1

M1 - 77

ER -