The Utility of Home-Practice in Mindfulness-Based Group Interventions: A Systematic Review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

The Utility of Home-Practice in Mindfulness-Based Group Interventions: A Systematic Review. / Lloyd, Annette; White, Ross; Eames, Catrin et al.
In: Mindfulness, Vol. 9, No. 3, 06.2018, p. 673-692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Lloyd A, White R, Eames C, Crane R. The Utility of Home-Practice in Mindfulness-Based Group Interventions: A Systematic Review. Mindfulness. 2018 Jun;9(3):673-692. Epub 2017 Sept 23. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0813-z

Author

Lloyd, Annette ; White, Ross ; Eames, Catrin et al. / The Utility of Home-Practice in Mindfulness-Based Group Interventions : A Systematic Review. In: Mindfulness. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 673-692.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Utility of Home-Practice in Mindfulness-Based Group Interventions

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Lloyd, Annette

AU - White, Ross

AU - Eames, Catrin

AU - Crane, Rebecca

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - A growing body of research supports the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). MBIs consider home-practice as essential to increasing the therapeutic effects of the treatment. To date however, the synthesis of the research conducted on the role of home-practice in controlled MBI studies has been a neglected area. This review aimed to conduct a narrative synthesis of published controlled studies, evaluating mindfulness-based group interventions, which have specifically measured home-practice. Empirical research literature published until June 2016 was searched using five databases. The search strategy focused on mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and home-practice. Included studies met the following criteria: controlled trials, participants 18 years and above, evaluations of MBSR or MBCT, utilised standardised quantitative outcome measures and monitored home-practice using a self-reported measure. Fourteen studies met the criteria and were included in the review. Across all studies, there was heterogeneity in the guidance and resources provided to participants and the approaches used for monitoring home-practice. In addition, the guidance on the length of home-practice was variable across studies, which indicates that research studies and teachers are not adhering to the published protocols. Finally, only seven studies examined the relationship between home-practice and clinical outcomes, of which four found that home-practice predicted improvements on clinical outcome measures. Future research should adopt a standardised approach for monitoring home-practice across MBIs. Additionally, studies should assess whether the amount of home-practice recommended to participants is in line with MBSR/MBCT manualised protocols. Finally, research should utilise experimental methodologies to explicitly explore the relationship between home-practice and clinical outcomes.

AB - A growing body of research supports the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). MBIs consider home-practice as essential to increasing the therapeutic effects of the treatment. To date however, the synthesis of the research conducted on the role of home-practice in controlled MBI studies has been a neglected area. This review aimed to conduct a narrative synthesis of published controlled studies, evaluating mindfulness-based group interventions, which have specifically measured home-practice. Empirical research literature published until June 2016 was searched using five databases. The search strategy focused on mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and home-practice. Included studies met the following criteria: controlled trials, participants 18 years and above, evaluations of MBSR or MBCT, utilised standardised quantitative outcome measures and monitored home-practice using a self-reported measure. Fourteen studies met the criteria and were included in the review. Across all studies, there was heterogeneity in the guidance and resources provided to participants and the approaches used for monitoring home-practice. In addition, the guidance on the length of home-practice was variable across studies, which indicates that research studies and teachers are not adhering to the published protocols. Finally, only seven studies examined the relationship between home-practice and clinical outcomes, of which four found that home-practice predicted improvements on clinical outcome measures. Future research should adopt a standardised approach for monitoring home-practice across MBIs. Additionally, studies should assess whether the amount of home-practice recommended to participants is in line with MBSR/MBCT manualised protocols. Finally, research should utilise experimental methodologies to explicitly explore the relationship between home-practice and clinical outcomes.

KW - Mindfulness-based stress reduction

KW - Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

KW - mindfulness-based interventions

KW - Home-practice

U2 - 10.1007/s12671-017-0813-z

DO - 10.1007/s12671-017-0813-z

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 673

EP - 692

JO - Mindfulness

JF - Mindfulness

SN - 1868-8527

IS - 3

ER -