Standard Standard

The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury. / Vaughan, Frances; Neal, Jo Anne ; Mulla, Farzana et al.
In: The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 31, No. 3, 04.2017, p. 544-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Vaughan F, Neal JA, Mulla F, Edwards B, Coetzer B. The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2017 Apr;31(3):544-568. Epub 2016 Nov 22. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1256434

Author

Vaughan, Frances ; Neal, Jo Anne ; Mulla, Farzana et al. / The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury. In: The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 544-568.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury.

AU - Vaughan, Frances

AU - Neal, Jo Anne

AU - Mulla, Farzana

AU - Edwards, Barbara

AU - Coetzer, Bernardus

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Objective: The Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) was developed as an in-service cognitive assessment battery for acquired brain injury patients entering community rehabilitation. The BICS focuses on domains that are particularly compromised following TBI, and provides a broader and more detailed assessment of executive function, attention and information processing than comparable screening assessments. The BICS also includes brief assessments of perception, naming, and construction, which were predicted to be more sensitive to impairments following non-traumatic brain injury. The studies reported here examine preliminary evidence for its validity in post-acute rehabilitation. Method: In Study 1, TBI patients completed the BICS and were compared with matched controls. Patients with focal lesions and matched controls were compared in Study 2. Study 3 examined demographic effects in a sample of normative data. Results: TBI and focal lesion patients obtained significantly lower composite memory, executive function and attention and information processing BICS scores than healthy controls. Injury severity effects were also obtained. Logistic regression analyses indicated that each group of BICS memory, executive function and attention measures reliably differentiated TBI and focal lesion participants from controls. Design Recall, Prospective Memory, Verbal Fluency, and Visual Search test scores showed significant independent regression effects. Other subtest measures showed evidence of sensitivity to brain injury. Conclusions: The study provides preliminary evidence of the BICS’ sensitivity to cognitive impairment caused by acquired brain injury, and its potential clinical utility as a cognitive screen. Further validation based on a revised version of the BICS and more normative data are required.

AB - Objective: The Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) was developed as an in-service cognitive assessment battery for acquired brain injury patients entering community rehabilitation. The BICS focuses on domains that are particularly compromised following TBI, and provides a broader and more detailed assessment of executive function, attention and information processing than comparable screening assessments. The BICS also includes brief assessments of perception, naming, and construction, which were predicted to be more sensitive to impairments following non-traumatic brain injury. The studies reported here examine preliminary evidence for its validity in post-acute rehabilitation. Method: In Study 1, TBI patients completed the BICS and were compared with matched controls. Patients with focal lesions and matched controls were compared in Study 2. Study 3 examined demographic effects in a sample of normative data. Results: TBI and focal lesion patients obtained significantly lower composite memory, executive function and attention and information processing BICS scores than healthy controls. Injury severity effects were also obtained. Logistic regression analyses indicated that each group of BICS memory, executive function and attention measures reliably differentiated TBI and focal lesion participants from controls. Design Recall, Prospective Memory, Verbal Fluency, and Visual Search test scores showed significant independent regression effects. Other subtest measures showed evidence of sensitivity to brain injury. Conclusions: The study provides preliminary evidence of the BICS’ sensitivity to cognitive impairment caused by acquired brain injury, and its potential clinical utility as a cognitive screen. Further validation based on a revised version of the BICS and more normative data are required.

KW - Traumatic Brain Injury

KW - Acquired Brain Injury

KW - Focal Cerebral lesion

KW - Cognitive screen assessment

KW - Cognitive screen normative data

U2 - 10.1080/13854046.2016.1256434

DO - 10.1080/13854046.2016.1256434

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 544

EP - 568

JO - The Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - The Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 3

ER -