To be seen or to hide: visual characteristics of body patterns for camouflage and communication in the Australian giant cuttlefish Sepia apama
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: American Naturalist, Vol. 177, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 681-90.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - To be seen or to hide
T2 - visual characteristics of body patterns for camouflage and communication in the Australian giant cuttlefish Sepia apama
AU - Zylinski, Sarah
AU - How, M J
AU - Osorio, D
AU - Hanlon, R T
AU - Marshall, N. J.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - It might seem obvious that a camouflaged animal must generally match its background whereas to be conspicuous an organism must differ from the background. However, the image parameters (or statistics) that evaluate the conspicuousness of patterns and textures are seldom well defined, and animal coloration patterns are rarely compared quantitatively with their respective backgrounds. Here we examine this issue in the Australian giant cuttlefish Sepia apama. We confine our analysis to the best-known and simplest image statistic, the correlation in intensity between neighboring pixels. Sepia apama can rapidly change their body patterns from assumed conspicuous signaling to assumed camouflage, thus providing an excellent and unique opportunity to investigate how such patterns differ in a single visual habitat. We describe the intensity variance and spatial frequency power spectra of these differing body patterns and compare these patterns with the backgrounds against which they are viewed. The measured image statistics of camouflaged animals closely resemble their backgrounds, while signaling animals differ significantly from their backgrounds. Our findings may provide the basis for a set of general rules for crypsis and signals. Furthermore, our methods may be widely applicable to the quantitative study of animal coloration.
AB - It might seem obvious that a camouflaged animal must generally match its background whereas to be conspicuous an organism must differ from the background. However, the image parameters (or statistics) that evaluate the conspicuousness of patterns and textures are seldom well defined, and animal coloration patterns are rarely compared quantitatively with their respective backgrounds. Here we examine this issue in the Australian giant cuttlefish Sepia apama. We confine our analysis to the best-known and simplest image statistic, the correlation in intensity between neighboring pixels. Sepia apama can rapidly change their body patterns from assumed conspicuous signaling to assumed camouflage, thus providing an excellent and unique opportunity to investigate how such patterns differ in a single visual habitat. We describe the intensity variance and spatial frequency power spectra of these differing body patterns and compare these patterns with the backgrounds against which they are viewed. The measured image statistics of camouflaged animals closely resemble their backgrounds, while signaling animals differ significantly from their backgrounds. Our findings may provide the basis for a set of general rules for crypsis and signals. Furthermore, our methods may be widely applicable to the quantitative study of animal coloration.
KW - Adaptation, Biological
KW - Animal Communication
KW - Animals
KW - Female
KW - Fourier Analysis
KW - Male
KW - Optical Phenomena
KW - Pigmentation
KW - Sepia
KW - Visual Perception
KW - Journal Article
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
U2 - 10.1086/659626
DO - 10.1086/659626
M3 - Article
C2 - 21508613
VL - 177
SP - 681
EP - 690
JO - American Naturalist
JF - American Naturalist
SN - 0003-0147
IS - 5
ER -