Standard Standard

Touch and Pain Sensations in Diadynamic Current(DD) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS): A Randomized Study. / Demidaś, Aneta; Zarzycki, Mikołaj.
In: Biomed Research International, Vol. 2019, 9073073, 17.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Demidaś A, Zarzycki M. Touch and Pain Sensations in Diadynamic Current(DD) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS): A Randomized Study. Biomed Research International. 2019 Jul 17;2019:9073073. doi: 10.1155/2019/9073073

Author

Demidaś, Aneta ; Zarzycki, Mikołaj. / Touch and Pain Sensations in Diadynamic Current(DD) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS): A Randomized Study. In: Biomed Research International. 2019 ; Vol. 2019.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Touch and Pain Sensations in Diadynamic Current(DD) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS): A Randomized Study

AU - Demidaś, Aneta

AU - Zarzycki, Mikołaj

PY - 2019/7/17

Y1 - 2019/7/17

N2 - The study investigated touch and pain sensations and the correlation between them in diadynamic current (DD) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), electrotherapies commonly applied in musculoskeletal disorders and occupational rehabilitation medicine. Forty healthy subjects were treated with either DD (n=20) or TENS (n=20). Each treatment consisted of three sessions with one-week interval. Touch sensation was determined with the JVP Domes esthesiometer, pain sensation with pressure pain threshold (PPT), and pressure pain tolerance threshold (PPTO) by an algometer. During each session the measurements were performed before the application of the procedure (T0), immediately after it (T1), and 30 minutes after the end of the procedure (T2). Both DD and TENS increased touch sensation (p<0.01) and did not significantly alter PPT and PPTO (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences in short-term effects, i.e., 3 weeks of the trial, were noted between DD and TENS in their influence on touch and pain sensations (p>0.05). There was a high significant correlation between touch and pain sensations in DD (r=0.86). TENS and DD caused similar analgesic effects. DD, which is shorter in the duration of the treatment, may comprise a realistic alternative to TENS in clinical practice of pain management.

AB - The study investigated touch and pain sensations and the correlation between them in diadynamic current (DD) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), electrotherapies commonly applied in musculoskeletal disorders and occupational rehabilitation medicine. Forty healthy subjects were treated with either DD (n=20) or TENS (n=20). Each treatment consisted of three sessions with one-week interval. Touch sensation was determined with the JVP Domes esthesiometer, pain sensation with pressure pain threshold (PPT), and pressure pain tolerance threshold (PPTO) by an algometer. During each session the measurements were performed before the application of the procedure (T0), immediately after it (T1), and 30 minutes after the end of the procedure (T2). Both DD and TENS increased touch sensation (p<0.01) and did not significantly alter PPT and PPTO (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences in short-term effects, i.e., 3 weeks of the trial, were noted between DD and TENS in their influence on touch and pain sensations (p>0.05). There was a high significant correlation between touch and pain sensations in DD (r=0.86). TENS and DD caused similar analgesic effects. DD, which is shorter in the duration of the treatment, may comprise a realistic alternative to TENS in clinical practice of pain management.

KW - diadynamic current

KW - TENS

KW - pain sensation

KW - tactile sensitivity

KW - gate control theory

KW - clinical rehabilitation medicine

U2 - 10.1155/2019/9073073

DO - 10.1155/2019/9073073

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

JO - Biomed Research International

JF - Biomed Research International

SN - 2314-6133

M1 - 9073073

ER -