Toward improved impact evaluation of community forest management in Indonesia
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Conservation Science and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 1, e2189, 01.2021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward improved impact evaluation of community forest management in Indonesia
AU - Meijaard , Erik
AU - Santika, Truly
AU - Wilson, Kerrie A
AU - Budiharta , Sugeng
AU - Kusworo , Ahmad
AU - Law, Elizabeth A.
AU - Friedman, Rachel
AU - Hutabarat, Joseph A.
AU - Indrawan, Tito P.
AU - St John, Freya A. V.
AU - Struebig, Matthew
N1 - Research Funding: Arcus Foundation, ARC Future Fellowship and Discovery programs, Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Woodspring Trust, UK Darwin Initiative
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Many tropical countries continue to devolve forest management to forest-dwelling communities. The assumption is that local knowledge of forests and communityengagement in forest management will attain multiple social and environmentalco-benefits, such as poverty alleviation and reduced deforestation and fires.Evidence for this, however, is scant, commonly hampered by data availabilityand a lack of technical capacity for implementing statistically robust impactevaluations. Based on a practice-based review of policy implementation,impact evaluation of case studies and examples of counterfactual analysesfrom Indonesia, we demonstrate that it is increasingly feasible to determinethe conditions under which community forest management will most likelyachieve its social and environmental objectives. Adapting community forestmanagement implementation based on feedback from accurate impact evaluation could lead to positive outcomes for people and environment in Indonesia, and across the tropical realm
AB - Many tropical countries continue to devolve forest management to forest-dwelling communities. The assumption is that local knowledge of forests and communityengagement in forest management will attain multiple social and environmentalco-benefits, such as poverty alleviation and reduced deforestation and fires.Evidence for this, however, is scant, commonly hampered by data availabilityand a lack of technical capacity for implementing statistically robust impactevaluations. Based on a practice-based review of policy implementation,impact evaluation of case studies and examples of counterfactual analysesfrom Indonesia, we demonstrate that it is increasingly feasible to determinethe conditions under which community forest management will most likelyachieve its social and environmental objectives. Adapting community forestmanagement implementation based on feedback from accurate impact evaluation could lead to positive outcomes for people and environment in Indonesia, and across the tropical realm
KW - biodiversity
KW - conservation
KW - deforestation
KW - forest
KW - impact evaluation
KW - poverty
KW - tropical forest management
KW - welfare
U2 - 10.1111/csp2.189
DO - 10.1111/csp2.189
M3 - Review article
VL - 3
JO - Conservation Science and Practice
JF - Conservation Science and Practice
SN - 2578-4854
IS - 1
M1 - e2189
ER -