Transformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areas
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 64, 101347, 01.10.2023.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Transformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areas
AU - Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
AU - Neugarten, Rachel A
AU - Gonzalez-Jimenez, David
AU - Ahmadia, Gabby
AU - Baird, Timothy D
AU - Crane, Nicole
AU - Delgoulet, Elise
AU - Eyster, Harold N
AU - Kurashima, Natalie
AU - Llopis, Jorge C
AU - Millington, Alice
AU - Pawlowska-Mainville, Agnieszka
AU - Rulmal, John
AU - Saunders, Fred
AU - Shrestha, Sushma
AU - Vaughan, Mehana Blaich
AU - Winter, Kawika B
AU - Wongbusarakum, Supin
AU - Pascual, Unai
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - As countries consider new area-based conservation targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas (PAs) and their impacts on people and nature are coming under increasing scrutiny. We review the evidence base on PA impacts, combining the findings from existing rigorous impact evaluations with local case studies developed for this study. We identify characteristics of PA establishment and management that improve the sustainability of biodiversity conservation and justice for local communities. We find that recognizing and respecting local values and knowledge about natural resource stewardship, colearning, and comanagement are key to achieving positive impacts for nature and people. Transforming PA governance toward more inclusive conservation depends upon the ability of PAs to be designed and implemented around the values and needs of local people.
AB - As countries consider new area-based conservation targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas (PAs) and their impacts on people and nature are coming under increasing scrutiny. We review the evidence base on PA impacts, combining the findings from existing rigorous impact evaluations with local case studies developed for this study. We identify characteristics of PA establishment and management that improve the sustainability of biodiversity conservation and justice for local communities. We find that recognizing and respecting local values and knowledge about natural resource stewardship, colearning, and comanagement are key to achieving positive impacts for nature and people. Transforming PA governance toward more inclusive conservation depends upon the ability of PAs to be designed and implemented around the values and needs of local people.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101347
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101347
M3 - Article
VL - 64
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
SN - 1877-3435
M1 - 101347
ER -