Trapping method and quota observance are pivotal to population stability in a harvested parrot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Trapping method and quota observance are pivotal to population stability in a harvested parrot. / Valle, Simon; Collar, Nigel; W. Edwin, Harris et al.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 217, 01.2018, p. 428-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Valle S, Collar N, W. Edwin H, Marsden S. Trapping method and quota observance are pivotal to population stability in a harvested parrot. Biological Conservation. 2018 Jan;217:428-436. Epub 2017 Dec 5. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.001

Author

Valle, Simon ; Collar, Nigel ; W. Edwin, Harris et al. / Trapping method and quota observance are pivotal to population stability in a harvested parrot. In: Biological Conservation. 2018 ; Vol. 217. pp. 428-436.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trapping method and quota observance are pivotal to population stability in a harvested parrot

AU - Valle, Simon

AU - Collar, Nigel

AU - W. Edwin, Harris

AU - Marsden, Stuart

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Wildlife trade is currently regulated mainly in terms of ‘volume’, i.e. the number of individuals taken from the wild or numbers appearing on the market in a given year. To explore the possible effects of other factors such as capture methods, variability in annual harvest, and habitat, we built and validated a demographic model for a closed population of Grey Parrots Psittacus erithacus on Príncipe, and ran 50-year simulations for the population under different harvest scenarios. There was a fine line between capture volumes being robustly sustainable (11% harvested) and dramatically unsustainable (15%). Population trajectories were highly sensitive to changes in adult survivorship, such that the inclusion of even a small number of adults among the harvest had a far greater impact than a similar number of juveniles. High annual variation in capture rate (reflecting poor national management of trade) could make the difference between sustainability and non-sustainability if quotas were set around critical harvest volumes. While these patterns may be common to large traded parrots generally, sufficient habitat and secure nest sites exist on Príncipe to render the effects of habitat loss on the island less important than in most other situations. If trade in parrots is to continue sustainably it will require reliable demographic and harvest data and must eliminate instability in quota observance (exceeded quotas are not compensated by shortfalls in other years) and, especially, the indiscriminate capture of adults.

AB - Wildlife trade is currently regulated mainly in terms of ‘volume’, i.e. the number of individuals taken from the wild or numbers appearing on the market in a given year. To explore the possible effects of other factors such as capture methods, variability in annual harvest, and habitat, we built and validated a demographic model for a closed population of Grey Parrots Psittacus erithacus on Príncipe, and ran 50-year simulations for the population under different harvest scenarios. There was a fine line between capture volumes being robustly sustainable (11% harvested) and dramatically unsustainable (15%). Population trajectories were highly sensitive to changes in adult survivorship, such that the inclusion of even a small number of adults among the harvest had a far greater impact than a similar number of juveniles. High annual variation in capture rate (reflecting poor national management of trade) could make the difference between sustainability and non-sustainability if quotas were set around critical harvest volumes. While these patterns may be common to large traded parrots generally, sufficient habitat and secure nest sites exist on Príncipe to render the effects of habitat loss on the island less important than in most other situations. If trade in parrots is to continue sustainably it will require reliable demographic and harvest data and must eliminate instability in quota observance (exceeded quotas are not compensated by shortfalls in other years) and, especially, the indiscriminate capture of adults.

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 217

SP - 428

EP - 436

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -