Two languages, two minds: Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Psychological Science, Vol. 26, No. 4, 06.03.2015, p. 518-526.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Two languages, two minds
T2 - Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation
AU - Athanasopoulos, P.
AU - Bylund, E.
AU - Montero-Melis, G.
AU - Damjanovic, L.
AU - Schartner, A.
AU - Kibbe, A.
AU - Riches, N.
AU - Thierry, Guillaume
PY - 2015/3/6
Y1 - 2015/3/6
N2 - We make sense of objects and events around us by classifying them into identifiable categories. The extent to which language affects this process has been the focus of a long-standing debate: Do different languages cause their speakers to behave differently? Here, we show that fluent German-English bilinguals categorize motion events according to the grammatical constraints of the language in which they operate. First, as predicted from cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding, participants functioning in a German testing context prefer to match events on the basis of motion completion to a greater extent than participants in an English context. Second, when participants suffer verbal interference in English, their categorization behavior is congruent with that predicted for German and when we switch the language of interference to German, their categorization becomes congruent with that predicted for English. These findings show that language effects on cognition are context-bound and transient, revealing unprecedented levels of malleability in human cognition.
AB - We make sense of objects and events around us by classifying them into identifiable categories. The extent to which language affects this process has been the focus of a long-standing debate: Do different languages cause their speakers to behave differently? Here, we show that fluent German-English bilinguals categorize motion events according to the grammatical constraints of the language in which they operate. First, as predicted from cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding, participants functioning in a German testing context prefer to match events on the basis of motion completion to a greater extent than participants in an English context. Second, when participants suffer verbal interference in English, their categorization behavior is congruent with that predicted for German and when we switch the language of interference to German, their categorization becomes congruent with that predicted for English. These findings show that language effects on cognition are context-bound and transient, revealing unprecedented levels of malleability in human cognition.
U2 - 10.1177/0956797614567509
DO - 10.1177/0956797614567509
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 518
EP - 526
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
SN - 0956-7976
IS - 4
ER -