Understanding the impact of visual arts interventions for people living with dementia: a realist review protocol
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: BMC Systematic Reviews, Vol. 3, No. 91, 15.08.2014.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the impact of visual arts interventions for people living with dementia: a realist review protocol
AU - Windle, G.
AU - Gregory, S.
AU - Newman, A.
AU - Goulding, A.
AU - O'Brien, D.
AU - Parkinson, C.
PY - 2014/8/15
Y1 - 2014/8/15
N2 - Arts-based activities are being increasingly suggested as a valuable activity for people living with dementia in terms of countering the negative aspects of their condition. The potential for such programmes to improve a broad range of psychosocial outcomes is suggested in some studies. However, there is largely an absence of rigorous methodology to demonstrate the benefits, and research results are mixed. Practice variability in terms of the content, contexts and implementation of such interventions raises challenges in terms of identifying an optimal arts programme model that could be adopted by other service providers. Understanding how interventions may have the best chance at broad implementation success and uptake is limited.
AB - Arts-based activities are being increasingly suggested as a valuable activity for people living with dementia in terms of countering the negative aspects of their condition. The potential for such programmes to improve a broad range of psychosocial outcomes is suggested in some studies. However, there is largely an absence of rigorous methodology to demonstrate the benefits, and research results are mixed. Practice variability in terms of the content, contexts and implementation of such interventions raises challenges in terms of identifying an optimal arts programme model that could be adopted by other service providers. Understanding how interventions may have the best chance at broad implementation success and uptake is limited.
U2 - 10.1186/2046-4053-3-91
DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-3-91
M3 - Article
VL - 3
JO - BMC Systematic Reviews
JF - BMC Systematic Reviews
IS - 91
ER -