Using Participatory Methods to Assess Data Poor Migrant Fisheries in Kenya
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2018, p. 569-586.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Participatory Methods to Assess Data Poor Migrant Fisheries in Kenya
AU - Ngao Wanyongi, Innocent
AU - Macharia, Denis
AU - Heenan, Adel
AU - Mangi, Stephen
N1 - The research was funded by Linnaeus University through COMARIO grant and WIOMSA through grant MASMA CR/2008/02.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Spatial information is limited for artisanal fisheries management and almost entirely absent for migrant fishers. Here, we addressed this data gap for East African migrant fishers via participatory mapping methods. We worked with 14 migrant fishing vessels operating from four fish landing sites in Kenya. We monitored individual vessels using GPS tracking to produce fishing ground intensity maps. We then generated fishing preference maps via focus group discussions. The fishing intensity maps provided high-resolution spatial information on fishing activities, whereas the fishing preference maps identified preferred fishing grounds. These two techniques generally showed high agreement. By further integrating these two fisher coproduced maps with supplemental vessel logbook data, it is clear that any spatial management measures would most affect migrant fishers using ringnets, hook and line, and cast nets gear. Our successful application of low-technology participatory mapping techniques to provide geospatial fisheries data have broad application to data poor fisheries worldwide.
AB - Spatial information is limited for artisanal fisheries management and almost entirely absent for migrant fishers. Here, we addressed this data gap for East African migrant fishers via participatory mapping methods. We worked with 14 migrant fishing vessels operating from four fish landing sites in Kenya. We monitored individual vessels using GPS tracking to produce fishing ground intensity maps. We then generated fishing preference maps via focus group discussions. The fishing intensity maps provided high-resolution spatial information on fishing activities, whereas the fishing preference maps identified preferred fishing grounds. These two techniques generally showed high agreement. By further integrating these two fisher coproduced maps with supplemental vessel logbook data, it is clear that any spatial management measures would most affect migrant fishers using ringnets, hook and line, and cast nets gear. Our successful application of low-technology participatory mapping techniques to provide geospatial fisheries data have broad application to data poor fisheries worldwide.
U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2018.1488304
DO - 10.1080/10871209.2018.1488304
M3 - Article
VL - 23
SP - 569
EP - 586
JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife
JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife
SN - 1533-158X
IS - 6
ER -