Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers. / Hold, N.; Murray, L.G.; Pantin, J.R. et al.
In: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 72, 06.03.2015, p. 1811-1821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Hold, N, Murray, LG, Pantin, JR, Haig, JA, Hinz, H & Kaiser, MJ 2015, 'Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers', ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 72, pp. 1811-1821. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

APA

Hold, N., Murray, L. G., Pantin, J. R., Haig, J. A., Hinz, H., & Kaiser, M. J. (2015). Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72, 1811-1821. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

CBE

Hold N, Murray LG, Pantin JR, Haig JA, Hinz H, Kaiser MJ. 2015. Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 72:1811-1821. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Hold N, Murray LG, Pantin JR, Haig JA, Hinz H, Kaiser MJ. Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2015 Mar 6;72:1811-1821. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

Author

Hold, N. ; Murray, L.G. ; Pantin, J.R. et al. / Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2015 ; Vol. 72. pp. 1811-1821.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video capture of crustacean fisheries data as an alternative to on-board observers

AU - Hold, N.

AU - Murray, L.G.

AU - Pantin, J.R.

AU - Haig, J.A.

AU - Hinz, H.

AU - Kaiser, M.J.

PY - 2015/3/6

Y1 - 2015/3/6

N2 - For EU member states to meet the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the reformed Common Fisheries Policy, it will be necessary to improve data collection related to many fisheries that are at present subject to relatively little monitoring or scientific research. This study evaluated the use of on-board camera systems to collect data from Cancer pagurus and Homarus gammarus fisheries. We evaluated the reliability of the hardware and its ability to collect images of sufficient accuracy and precision compared with using on-board observers. Fishers and on-board observers passed animals removed from traps across a defined area. The relationship between the in situ and predicted measurements of carapace length of lobsters or carapace width (CW) of crabs was investigated. The mean difference between the predicted and real crab measurements was −0.853 mm with a standard error of 0.378 mm. Suggesting that the model tends to underestimate the real CW slightly. The mean difference between predicted and real data for lobsters was 0.085 mm with a standard error of 0.208 mm. Sex allocation for crabs based on video images was 100% accurate. All male lobsters were correctly assigned. For lobsters >86 mm in length, the correct female sex allocation was 100% accurate. For smaller lobsters, the accuracy of sex allocation decreased to a low of 51% in lobsters

AB - For EU member states to meet the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the reformed Common Fisheries Policy, it will be necessary to improve data collection related to many fisheries that are at present subject to relatively little monitoring or scientific research. This study evaluated the use of on-board camera systems to collect data from Cancer pagurus and Homarus gammarus fisheries. We evaluated the reliability of the hardware and its ability to collect images of sufficient accuracy and precision compared with using on-board observers. Fishers and on-board observers passed animals removed from traps across a defined area. The relationship between the in situ and predicted measurements of carapace length of lobsters or carapace width (CW) of crabs was investigated. The mean difference between the predicted and real crab measurements was −0.853 mm with a standard error of 0.378 mm. Suggesting that the model tends to underestimate the real CW slightly. The mean difference between predicted and real data for lobsters was 0.085 mm with a standard error of 0.208 mm. Sex allocation for crabs based on video images was 100% accurate. All male lobsters were correctly assigned. For lobsters >86 mm in length, the correct female sex allocation was 100% accurate. For smaller lobsters, the accuracy of sex allocation decreased to a low of 51% in lobsters

U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsv030

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 1811

EP - 1821

JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science

JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science

SN - 1054-3139

ER -