Electronic versions

  • Heinz-Josef Tueselmann
    Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Matthew M. C. Allen
    University of Manchester
  • Frank McDonald
    University of Liverpool
Foreign-owned firms help to disseminate management practices across UK companies; this includes the ability of indigenous firms to learn improved human resource management (HRM) practices from leading foreign companies. Analysing the transfer of HRM policies forms an important strand of the international HRM and comparative capitalisms literatures; however, large-scale, comparative studies of voice patterns in German, US and, in particular, French subsidiaries in the UK are limited. This paper draws on a major survey that includes the, to date, largest sample of French MNC subsidiaries. It does not simply identify the existence of different kinds of voice mechanisms, but examines how these different practices come together in the implementation of subsidiaries' voice policies. This enables the detection of subtle, but important, differences in the subsidiaries' voice practices. French subsidiaries are significantly less likely to pursue a partnership approach to voice than their German and US counterparts. French and US establishments are significantly more likely to adopt a ‘bleak house’ approach than German ones. Importantly, these key differences only emerge at a fine-grained level of analysis that examines how subsidiaries implement voice practices.

Keywords

  • HR practices, multinational companies, direct voice, Varieties of Capitalism, employee voice
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1168
JournalInternational Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes
View graph of relations