A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Behavioral Interventions, Cyfrol 36, Rhif 4, 11.2021, t. 1024-1041.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures
AU - Foran Conn, Denise
AU - Hoerger, Marguerite
AU - Kelly, Eimear
AU - Cross, Richard
AU - Jones, Serena
AU - Walley, Hannah
AU - Firth, Lauren
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting and error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete trial training. These strategies need to be effective and efficient. We compared a novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, to most to least prompting and no-no prompting. A parallel treatments design, nestled in a modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was used to compare the three procedures with three participants. The responsive prompt delay procedure was at least as effective as most to least prompting and no-no prompting procedures for three participants; the time required for each participant to master the skills was variable across procedures.
AB - Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting and error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete trial training. These strategies need to be effective and efficient. We compared a novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, to most to least prompting and no-no prompting. A parallel treatments design, nestled in a modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was used to compare the three procedures with three participants. The responsive prompt delay procedure was at least as effective as most to least prompting and no-no prompting procedures for three participants; the time required for each participant to master the skills was variable across procedures.
KW - discrete trial training
KW - error correction
KW - errorless learning
KW - most-to-least prompting
KW - no-no prompting
U2 - 10.1002/bin.1808
DO - 10.1002/bin.1808
M3 - Article
VL - 36
SP - 1024
EP - 1041
JO - Behavioral Interventions
JF - Behavioral Interventions
SN - 1072-0847
IS - 4
ER -