A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures. / Foran Conn, Denise; Hoerger, Marguerite; Kelly, Eimear et al.
In: Behavioral Interventions, Vol. 36, No. 4, 11.2021, p. 1024-1041.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Foran Conn, D, Hoerger, M, Kelly, E, Cross, R, Jones, S, Walley, H & Firth, L 2021, 'A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures', Behavioral Interventions, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1024-1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1808

APA

Foran Conn, D., Hoerger, M., Kelly, E., Cross, R., Jones, S., Walley, H., & Firth, L. (2021). A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures. Behavioral Interventions, 36(4), 1024-1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1808

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Foran Conn D, Hoerger M, Kelly E, Cross R, Jones S, Walley H et al. A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures. Behavioral Interventions. 2021 Nov;36(4):1024-1041. Epub 2021 Jun 28. doi: 10.1002/bin.1808

Author

Foran Conn, Denise ; Hoerger, Marguerite ; Kelly, Eimear et al. / A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures. In: Behavioral Interventions. 2021 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 1024-1041.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of most to least prompting, no-no prompting, and responsive prompt delay procedures

AU - Foran Conn, Denise

AU - Hoerger, Marguerite

AU - Kelly, Eimear

AU - Cross, Richard

AU - Jones, Serena

AU - Walley, Hannah

AU - Firth, Lauren

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting and error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete trial training. These strategies need to be effective and efficient. We compared a novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, to most to least prompting and no-no prompting. A parallel treatments design, nestled in a modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was used to compare the three procedures with three participants. The responsive prompt delay procedure was at least as effective as most to least prompting and no-no prompting procedures for three participants; the time required for each participant to master the skills was variable across procedures.

AB - Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting and error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete trial training. These strategies need to be effective and efficient. We compared a novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, to most to least prompting and no-no prompting. A parallel treatments design, nestled in a modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was used to compare the three procedures with three participants. The responsive prompt delay procedure was at least as effective as most to least prompting and no-no prompting procedures for three participants; the time required for each participant to master the skills was variable across procedures.

KW - discrete trial training

KW - error correction

KW - errorless learning

KW - most-to-least prompting

KW - no-no prompting

U2 - 10.1002/bin.1808

DO - 10.1002/bin.1808

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1024

EP - 1041

JO - Behavioral Interventions

JF - Behavioral Interventions

SN - 1072-0847

IS - 4

ER -